Rd, I'll be rooting for you today. Tell me a little more on the Ochoa angle.
*Are you saying that HISTORICALLY it's been a +EV angle?
...If so, can you give me the stats on this?
...# starts, # wins, Avg Price, etc.
I told you that I believe in your approach. Profitable betting is normally a result of discrepancy in two items: 1) Tote Board versus 2) True Odds.
Like you say, people might be sleeping on Ochoa. If it's not in the recent trend, people ignore it. I hope you bag some profits today.
Betting Ochoa blind over the last 6 years or so is profitable. He’s had some monster meets in there. He is the type of trainer I like to focus on; one that hits at around 6-10% for a career but has a knack for scoring with 40-1, 50-1, 60-1 bombs etc. I’ve seen him do it many times at different tracks.
Unfortunately, I don’t have access to the full stats anymore. It’s too much time and effort to compile, of which I don’t have. I usually pay $40 for a Jim Mazur book per meet. He’s a statistician and gambler. His stats usually go back three previous meets. Was quite handy. He discontinued his Tampa book this year, and I disposed of the version from last meet. Working this year mostly from memory.
One Ochoa winner, if played correctly, can make one’s year. Same goes for a guy like Uriah St Lewis. The trick is timing it right AND structuring right. I am a work in progress (35 years
) when it comes to structuring.
This type of wagering is not for the faint of heart, though. I go through LONG losing streaks during the course of the year. Most couldn’t stand the misery and bleeding money for long stretches. I can because I’ve seen guys like Ochoa, Uriah, Arboritanza, Schistl, etc bomb one or two out, year after year. Everyone else is betting Chad Brown, Pletcher, etc, while “my guys” go ignored.
Hope that answers your question. If I am able to retrieve my past trainer stats, I will be sure to post them here.