LIVE Thursday Night (10/20) DEBATE - Vitterd vs. Donk 🧐

[BigJay]

Did not. I would have worn a suit.

 

[Bubbles]

 

[vitterd]

10 convicted first-degree murderers John Fetterman helped release from prison

Pennsylvania Lt. Gov. and Democratic Senate candidate John Fetterman, who chairs the state's Board of Pardons, has helped release at least 10 first-degree murderers.

www.foxnews.com

If you can find a Senate betting prop take the GOP 51+ seats. Should be +200

538 still has Dems winning control at 60%.

I'm telling you the Republicans are taking probably 52 seats, maybe 53.

Oz at +240 in PA a good bet too.

Fetterman getting crucified in panels by Independent voters

Slow your roll Reagan.

 

[Bubbles]

i watch the video till the end and sam's reaction was the best. you know, just listening to the chaos while feeling relax.

 

[samsncharge99]

im always nice and relaxed at home

stressed backwards is desserts

 

[vitterd]

I guess everyone can look at it different ways. How does one react if one dude is making 5 threads a week about you, posting your picture, saying things that are completely false about how look, what you’ve said, what you’ve done. I think it’s easy to say how you would react until you’re on the other end of it.

 

[samsncharge99]

actually i was ready to start munchies. As soon as that video ended, I was in the snack cabinet

 

[Tanko]

actually i was ready to start munchies. As soon as that video ended, I was in the snack cabinet

Lost some baller coins on you Sammy. Had you finishing in top 5 in poker.
I knew I was screwed when you lit up...

 

[Tanko]

Vitty, you going to any of the Phillies/Pads series?
Would kill to have tickets to just one of those games.

 

[Bubbles]

actually i was ready to start munchies. As soon as that video ended, I was in the snack cabinet

just imagine eating your snacks let's say pop corn in the middle of vitty's/dunk arguments. that would be epic haha

 

[Tanko]

Astros Tickets (if there is a game 6 or 7) are not too bad. $400 gets you seat on first base line even with the base, 20 rows up. Contemplating the purchase.

Downside is, if I buy those tickets, the wife will want to get something in return of similar value.

 

[vitterd]

Vitty, you going to any of the Phillies/Pads series?
Would kill to have tickets to just one of those games.

Im going Saturday and Sunday!

 

[samsncharge99]

just imagine eating your snacks let's say pop corn in the middle of vitty's/dunk arguments. that would be epic haha

at one point i did start eating crackers, then i watched myself eating crackers and was like NO ONE wants to watch another person eat....so i put them away

 

[Bubbles]

at one point i did start eating crackers, then i watched myself eating crackers and was like NO ONE wants to watch another person eat....so i put them away

oh god sammy! you're the man for keeping it together. man salute

 

[lemartinsports]

stressed backwards is desserts

this blew my mind

 

[biggins]

The part where Vitty conceded to Trumps victory was perplexing to me especially since you’re in Pennsylvania. We were told to expect a red mirage and we knew for some stupid ass reason Pennsylvania doesn’t start counting mail ballots till day of.
When l went to bed that night Trump was -550 I’m like WTF so put $100 on Biden and sure enough when l woke up Biden was -650 and it was all over except the fat lady.

 

[savage1]

I just came over to this forum for the first time a few days ago and signed up for a membership

today.

I watched the "great debate" last night between vitterd and donk and decided to do a review.

This review unlike most of the other ones is fairly lengthy, but if you are interested here goes:

I just got finished watching the replay of the debate and here are a few quick takeaways:

1) Obviously vitterd and donk go way back, meaning that I don't know all of

the history and details of their past encounters as a new member, which in turn means

that what I am going to say is based on the exchange tonight only.

2) Aside from the histrionics, especially by Donk, which reminded me of

what one might see when two pro wrestlers are going at each other on tv trying to

hype a match to bring in revenues, what struck me about Donk is that he strikes me

as a very crude individual whose modus operandi is to attack and shoot from the hip.

In a sense, he reminds me of the kind of a person sitting as a bat who has a bit too much to

drink, who foams at the mouth and just sounds off to anyone within listening distance on any given

topic.

For me, besides the name-calling, two statements he made gave him away for me as

as a very shallow individual, who just says anything which comes to mind at a given moment

His statement about what happened on Election Night with his inference that vitterd

along with me and lots of other people who conceded the Election very late at night

(because it looked like Trump was going to win), but in the morning

when the absentee votes came in and as expected, changed everything dramatically,

in donk's his opinion it somehow "proved" that Trump "won" because Vitterd

and many others assumed that Trump had won, for me shows a very shallow

and illogical way of thinking.

Vitterd's response was appropriate with his comparison about teams coming back

from big deficits when it looks like they have no chance.

In addition, donk's comments about stereotyping vitterd as a "typical democrat," is

just one more example of his one-way shallowness in the manner in which he thinks and

speaks. which imo is typical of many Trump cult members.

3) While vitterd did respond in kind to his attacks, he did it in a much

more measured way, and he had every right to do so, and I would have done

the same thing even though I much prefer civil debates where name-calling and insults are

not permitted.

4) Let's put it this way:

Even if vitterd and I disagreed about Trump, I have a gut feeling that we could sit down and express

our views without going into attack mode.

I didn't get that feeling at all when it comes to donk.:

What disappointed me is the fact that there was virtually no discussion/debate about

Trump and Biden such as in the other forum debates of this nature.

Perhaps that was not the intent, but rather to just let these two fire away about anything

including of course name calling and insults which for me as a reader is not very productive,

and after a while just plain boring!!

Imo if there was a discussion/debate about Trump and most other topics between vitterd

and donk, vitterd would prevail most of the time simply because imo he

is much brighter than donk and has the ability to express his

thoughts, documentation, and logic and draw conclusions much better overall.

Obviously a number of people will disagree with my assessment of the dbate and that's fine.

I will read and respect any responses to my post but will not debate it for the simple

reason that neither of us is going to change the other's opinion nor the criterion used.

That's it.

Thanks for those who took the time to read this whetheyr they agree or not!!

 

[BobbyFK]

i watch the video till the end and sam's reaction was the best. you know, just listening to the chaos while feeling relax.

That was because of the bud he smoked and the push-ups he did

 

[BobbyFK]

I just came over to this forum for the first time a few days ago and signed up for a membership

today.

I watched the "great debate" last night between vitterd and donk and decided to do a review.

This review unlike most of the other ones is fairly lengthy, but if you are interested here goes:

I just got finished watching the replay of the debate and here are a few quick takeaways:

1) Obviously vitterd and donk go way back, meaning that I don't know all of

the history and details of their past encounters as a new member, which in turn means

that what I am going to say is based on the exchange tonight only.

2) Aside from the histrionics, especially by Donk, which reminded me of

what one might see when two pro wrestlers are going at each other on tv trying to

hype a match to bring in revenues, what struck me about Donk is that he strikes me

as a very crude individual whose modus operandi is to attack and shoot from the hip.

In a sense, he reminds me of the kind of a person sitting as a bat who has a bit too much to

drink, who foams at the mouth and just sounds off to anyone within listening distance on any given

topic.

For me, besides the name-calling, two statements he made gave him away for me as

as a very shallow individual, who just says anything which comes to mind at a given moment

His statement about what happened on Election Night with his inference that vitterd

along with me and lots of other people who conceded the Election very late at night

(because it looked like Trump was going to win), but in the morning

when the absentee votes came in and as expected, changed everything dramatically,

in donk's his opinion it somehow "proved" that Trump "won" because Vitterd

and many others assumed that Trump had won, for me shows a very shallow

and illogical way of thinking.

Vitterd's response was appropriate with his comparison about teams coming back

from big deficits when it looks like they have no chance.

In addition, donk's comments about stereotyping vitterd as a "typical democrat," is

just one more example of his one-way shallowness in the manner in which he thinks and

speaks. which imo is typical of many Trump cult members.

3) While vitterd did respond in kind to his attacks, he did it in a much

more measured way, and he had every right to do so, and I would have done

the same thing even though I much prefer civil debates where name-calling and insults are

not permitted.

4) Let's put it this way:

Even if vitterd and I disagreed about Trump, I have a gut feeling that we could sit down and express

our views without going into attack mode.

I didn't get that feeling at all when it comes to donk.:

What disappointed me is the fact that there was virtually no discussion/debate about

Trump and Biden such as in the other forum debates of this nature.

Perhaps that was not the intent, but rather to just let these two fire away about anything

including of course name calling and insults which for me as a reader is not very productive,

and after a while just plain boring!!

Imo if there was a discussion/debate about Trump and most other topics between vitterd

and donk, vitterd would prevail most of the time simply because imo he

is much brighter than donk and has the ability to express his

thoughts, documentation, and logic and draw conclusions much better overall.

Obviously a number of people will disagree with my assessment of the dbate and that's fine.

I will read and respect any responses to my post but will not debate it for the simple

reason that neither of us is going to change the other's opinion nor the criterion used.

That's it.

Thanks for those who took the time to read this whetheyr they agree or not!!

Welcome to bmr! Wonderful review of the debate and good luck this weekend on all your action.

The intent of this debate was not a trump/biden thing so that's why it was not heavily focused on that aspect of it

 

[lemartinsports]

I just came over to this forum for the first time a few days ago and signed up for a membership

today.

I watched the "great debate" last night between vitterd and donk and decided to do a review.

This review unlike most of the other ones is fairly lengthy, but if you are interested here goes:

I just got finished watching the replay of the debate and here are a few quick takeaways:

1) Obviously vitterd and donk go way back, meaning that I don't know all of

the history and details of their past encounters as a new member, which in turn means

that what I am going to say is based on the exchange tonight only.

2) Aside from the histrionics, especially by Donk, which reminded me of

what one might see when two pro wrestlers are going at each other on tv trying to

hype a match to bring in revenues, what struck me about Donk is that he strikes me

as a very crude individual whose modus operandi is to attack and shoot from the hip.

In a sense, he reminds me of the kind of a person sitting as a bat who has a bit too much to

drink, who foams at the mouth and just sounds off to anyone within listening distance on any given

topic.

For me, besides the name-calling, two statements he made gave him away for me as

as a very shallow individual, who just says anything which comes to mind at a given moment

His statement about what happened on Election Night with his inference that vitterd

along with me and lots of other people who conceded the Election very late at night

(because it looked like Trump was going to win), but in the morning

when the absentee votes came in and as expected, changed everything dramatically,

in donk's his opinion it somehow "proved" that Trump "won" because Vitterd

and many others assumed that Trump had won, for me shows a very shallow

and illogical way of thinking.

Vitterd's response was appropriate with his comparison about teams coming back

from big deficits when it looks like they have no chance.

In addition, donk's comments about stereotyping vitterd as a "typical democrat," is

just one more example of his one-way shallowness in the manner in which he thinks and

speaks. which imo is typical of many Trump cult members.

3) While vitterd did respond in kind to his attacks, he did it in a much

more measured way, and he had every right to do so, and I would have done

the same thing even though I much prefer civil debates where name-calling and insults are

not permitted.

4) Let's put it this way:

Even if vitterd and I disagreed about Trump, I have a gut feeling that we could sit down and express

our views without going into attack mode.

I didn't get that feeling at all when it comes to donk.:

What disappointed me is the fact that there was virtually no discussion/debate about

Trump and Biden such as in the other forum debates of this nature.

Perhaps that was not the intent, but rather to just let these two fire away about anything

including of course name calling and insults which for me as a reader is not very productive,

and after a while just plain boring!!

Imo if there was a discussion/debate about Trump and most other topics between vitterd

and donk, vitterd would prevail most of the time simply because imo he

is much brighter than donk and has the ability to express his

thoughts, documentation, and logic and draw conclusions much better overall.

Obviously a number of people will disagree with my assessment of the dbate and that's fine.

I will read and respect any responses to my post but will not debate it for the simple

reason that neither of us is going to change the other's opinion nor the criterion used.

That's it.

Thanks for those who took the time to read this whetheyr they agree or not!!

welcome @savage1 ! appreciate the review

so this "debate" wasn't really about their political views, but more about these two posters and their on going beef for a long time now. we were hoping to get to a resolution between the two and i think in the end things were ok. not a fixed relationship, but a lot of steam was let off for sure