How The Heck Oregon -9.5 Over Washington

[quantumleap]

What does this mean? I have a history of using 1 game? That’s just blatantly wrong lol

Plus I listed 8 games. Are you a Washington fan or something?

Books are wrong sometimes, but it’s not hard to conclude that Oregon is better than Washington. An outcome of a single game doesn’t make a book “wrong”. That’s not how lines work. Like if Washington finds a way to win Friday, that doesn’t make the “line wrong.”

The line should be about Oregon -11, so this line actually looks pretty efficient.

You only listed the line of 1 game to make a specific point, not to make the point we were talking about before. Two different points. Your muddling things together.

You don't understand how lines work then. If the result quite a bit off from the line then the books were off and that works for just one game.

 

[stormtrooper8]

You only listed the line of 1 game to make a specific point, not to make the point we were talking about before. Two different points. Your muddling things together.

You don't understand how lines work then. If the result quite a bit off from the line then the books were off and that works for just one game.

Not sure what you mean by that first part. Very confusing

The line isn’t automatically off if the game doesn’t result on the number or close to it. Washington could win by 3. Oregon could win by 28. Doesn’t mean the line was wrong in either case

 

[stormtrooper8]

Sports books don’t overreact to one game sample sizes

Washington winning is well within the range of outcomes

Oregon winning by 3+ touchdowns is well within the range of outcomes

The line is still accurate. This game is probably one of the more accurately lined games

 

[quantumleap]

Not sure what you mean by that first part. Very confusing

The line isn’t automatically off if the game doesn’t result on the number or close to it. Washington could win by 3. Oregon could win by 28. Doesn’t mean the line was wrong in either case

It seems you and I are using different reasoning as to how we come to our separate conclusions. I look forward to watching the game to see what bears out.

Thanks for the spirited conversation.

 

[stormtrooper8]

It seems you and I are using different reasoning as to how we come to our separate conclusions. I look forward to watching the game to see what bears out.

Thanks for the spirited conversation.

If the Ducks don’t cover, I hope Washington wins

Good luck

 

[harpo]

Yep should be 13.5 as they win by at least 14

 

[Wagerallsports]

Almost plugged Oregon ML into a parlay but just couldn't do it

Dangerous game

 

[Tanko]

Almost plugged Oregon ML into a parlay but just couldn't do it

Dangerous game

It really is tough to read this game.
I think Oregon will put the hammer to the Huskies but, I don't have an overwhelming level of confidence in that play.

 

[Wagerallsports]

It really is tough to read this game.
I think Oregon will put the hammer to the Huskies but, I don't have an overwhelming level of confidence in that play.

You are probably right

I even looked at playing Washington +14.5 (-180) but couldn't

This game is a mystery

 

[stormtrooper8]

Yep should be 13.5 as they win by at least 14

Honestly probably right

 

[stormtrooper8]

Almost plugged Oregon ML into a parlay but just couldn't do it

Dangerous game

What's tricky about it is if Oregon is struggling and it's a close game, I don't trust Lanning to make the right decisions down the stretch

The first game kind of went that way

If they build a lead though they could route them

 

[Wagerallsports]

wtf

I’m so CONFUSED

LoL jj knew

 

[jjgold]

Good win guys
That line was way off

 

[fishhead]

GOLD very underrated with his opinions.

 

[theriver55]

GOLD very underrated with his opinions.

for sure

 

[JDS]

GOLD very underrated with his opinions.

Too bad he didn’t bet into his opinion missed opportunity for him & his bankroll.

 

[stormtrooper8]

Good win guys
That line was way off

Washington played a great game, and Oregon did not play to the level they have been playing.

Doesn’t mean the line was “way off”. One game sample sizes don’t prove anything about a betting line

Like I said earlier, Washington winning was well within the range of outcomes given that line

 

[fishhead]

GOLD very underrated with his opinions.

Let me repeat this.

GL GOLD

 

[slickfazzer]

If GOLD would focus, he could be back in talks for gambling professionally again.

He might lack focus?

 

[stormtrooper8]

If GOLD would focus, he could be back in talks for gambling professionally again.

He might lack focus?

Too focused on trying to find out my dick size