carolinakid
carolinakid
BMR Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2021
- Messages
- 39,046
From watching live numbers from outs that i trust that does a lot of money bets, from sharps
Mike did you play Fordham ?True but Richmond sucks
lol
Nice winFirst half last second
Exactly!Yeah I feel like the biggest liabilities in the sportsbooks those are the plays we need to find and play in the long run.
Mid to late season is where you can spot these insufficiencies more clearly, because we have data to analyze. The first quarter and half of the season you can get away with following the teams that are hot and cold ATS. Mid to late season you’ll get buried my fellow gamblers.Exactly!
It dosent matter if its high profile / low profile games.
Sure one could really try to follow the breadcrumbs of info on not so well known teams and beat the book as well.
But the high profile ones are where its at. Its much easier to cap. infact, u dont even have to look at stats, know a single players name , injuries etc. the line and popularity of the team + the major "story line" will tell u everything.
If a road team is 1-9 and the home team is 9-1 W/L , which ATS would an avg. gambler take ?
one should blindly take the 1-9 team ATS.
For example , through 17 weeks of NFL... there are about ~100 prime time games..
These games take WAY more action $ wise compared to ALL the afternoon ones combined on that day.
Now, are the books really trying to go like 40w-60L on these games? HELL NO.
Books are not computers, and the games we're betting on are not robots either.
otherwise any1 could pull a calculator out and win all the time.
They are human beings just like us. and All human beings are selfish by nature.
Sure they could plug all the info, stats, etc.
((btw which is way more/accurate than all of us on this forum could ever acquire -
and all of it , is already factored into the line))
+ each teams market value, spit out the closest projection no.
Take the ~10% juice (~4.5 % profit long term) and call it a day.
But WHY do that?, when they already know the probable outcomes of most of these games.
(esp. from the ledger/profiles of sharp players $ coming in )
So shade the line even more and trap the avg. bettor = gain even more profit.
There is a reason why the true % consensus of no. of tickets & total $ amount on each side from any major book is not public information.
Sure, Nothing is a 100% . maybe a key player gets injured, maybe he found out his wife cheated on him last night, maybe he didnt sleep well, or is too hungover.. who tf knows. But I truly believe for a good 2/3rds + of the games. ESP. the high profile games.. the books already know the Most PROBABLE (80%+ certainty) outcome/ comfortable ATS win by tip off.
Quite simply depends on if ur siding with the book or the hook(bait)
Thoughts?
Ofc. just look at today's game.
NO.3 Houston (-11.5 !!) @ unranked Temple. is the only prime high profile game on a sunday.
What would u guess the books on leaning on ? Ofc. Temple to cover... so i'm just going to take them.
like it does not even matter what the spread is ... its still going to probably not cover. simply becuz most ppl at first glance would say , yea i like Houston.. they should beat em down.
Same page Pistol PeteLike i cant even name a single player in entire NCAAB. nor do i ever watch it.
simply by looking at the situation.
its a singular top25. game on a SUNDAY. any joe blow would go , a No. 3! Ranked Houston vs an UNranked team ? HOU should crush them... by like what 10pts? spread is a 11.5 tho ( 1.5 more shading) - kind of like why arent things simply 5$ or 10$ ? instead 4.95.. 9.99... its psychological.
by the time u get to the counter its 6.xx or 11.xx $ something, including tax etc.
So i'm taking temple ATS blindly and even sprinkling some on the ML.
it dosent matter if they get blown out. LONG term- these are the plays i think are sharp.
no research neccessary
Richmond wins and covers, this is your typical bait and switch by these sportsbooks.A very reputable computer model in my opinion is showing this for the game I mentioned.
View attachment 9087
Thanks for the reply, ck!From watching live numbers from outs that i trust that does a lot of money bets, from sharps
Let’s see if we can get Memphis -3 for a profit Petey.so take Memphis , fade Iona, & take Richmond all ATS correct?
Coach, call me.
It's funny you say that. Just yesterday I was taking the home teams with good home records playing against road teams with bad road records. The road teams covered more than the home teams. I lost quite a few units. Then I started doing the opposite later in the day.If a road team is 1-9 and the home team is 9-1 W/L , which ATS would an avg. gambler take ?
one should blindly take the 1-9 team ATS.
For example , through 17 weeks of NFL... there are about ~100 prime time games..
These games take WAY more action $ wise compared to ALL the afternoon ones combined on that day.
Exactly. They still have to play the games. One simple thing could disrupt the momentum of a team and there goes the cover.Now, are the books really trying to go like 40w-60L on these games? HELL NO.
Books are not computers, and the games we're betting on are not robots either.
otherwise any1 could pull a calculator out and win all the time.
They are human beings just like us. and All human beings are selfish by nature.
Spot on. If it were, we could use that info to win more than lose.There is a reason why the true % consensus of no. of tickets & total $ amount on each side from any major book is not public information.
Interesting. I've thought that too and for years tried to see which side the "sharp" books are on but haven't been able to figure that out.Sure, Nothing is a 100% . maybe a key player gets injured, maybe he found out his wife cheated on him last night, maybe he didnt sleep well, or is too hungover.. who tf knows. But I truly believe for a good 2/3rds + of the games. ESP. the high profile games.. the books already know the Most PROBABLE (80%+ certainty) outcome/ comfortable ATS win by tip off.
Temple beat Houston in Houston last month. Now they are 10 1/2 point underdogs at home today.Ofc. just look at today's game.
NO.3 Houston (-11.5 !!) @ unranked Temple. is the only prime high profile game on a sunday.
What would u guess the books on leaning on ? Ofc. Temple to cover... so i'm just going to take them.
like it does not even matter what the spread is ... its still going to probably not cover. simply becuz most ppl at first glance would say , yea i like Houston.. they should beat em down.
If you knew a sportsbook Pit Boss in the industry this would be very valuable information, because he could decipher for you. That’s if he wanted to help you of course.It's funny you say that. Just yesterday I was taking the home teams with good home records playing against road teams with bad road records. The road teams covered more than the home teams. I lost quite a few units. Then I started doing the opposite later in the day.
A couple games coming later today:
Penn St (3-7 on the road) playing Nebraska (7-3 at home) and Penn State is favored! I took Penn St. -5.
Stanford (3-8 on the road) playing Colorado (10-2 at home). I took Stanford +5.
Exactly. They still have to play the games. One simple thing could disrupt the momentum of a team and there goes the cover.
Spot on. If it were, we could use that info to win more than lose.
Interesting. I've thought that too and for years tried to see which side the "sharp" books are on but haven't been able to figure that out.