Who’s name at BMR is most likely to be in the Epstein files??

[BigJay]

@flyingillini ???

Who else??

 

[jjgold]

I don’t think anyone we like the older ones , I was dreaming about a 71 year-old woman. I wish she was riding me the whole night.

 

[Archie]

that's great endurance for pensioners

 

[europro]

@Brock Landers

 

[BMR Genie]

 

[jamesy2422]

I don’t think anyone we like the older ones , I was dreaming about a 71 year-old woman. I wish she was riding me the whole night.

she give you a wurther's candy after you were done?

 

[lekidecincinnati]

some guy from minnesota

 

[jamesy2422]

I don’t think anyone we like the older ones , I was dreaming about a 71 year-old woman. I wish she was riding me the whole night.

JJ was this at 4:30pm after the 3pm dinner?

 

[maltedhopsfrenzy]

some guy from minnesota

Figure you’d need plenty of $$$$$$ - he’s probably one of the only ones here who could afford it…..

 

[BigJay]

some guy from minnesota

@MinnesotaFats no reply??

 

[MinnesotaFats]

On advice of council I affirm my 5th amendment rights

 

[Archie]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1948202281100255396

 

[phillyflyers]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1948202281100255396

Not a good look for Trump.

He should address this but probably thinks it's beneath him.

Also, I don't like the way the attorney posed that question.

What the fukk does socialize mean?

It's too broad and open for interpretations.

Should have asked him outright if he ever witnessed Trump or was in the presence of Trump having sex with underage girls.

He might have gotten a firm no for an answer instead of invoking his rights.

 

[MinnesotaFats]

The issue with releasing Epsteins call log is that there are HUNDREDS of names on there that did nothing wrong. Some might be just dudes Epstein called to solicite fundraising or charity donations.

If those names get linked to him via release of Federal investigation notes or Grand Jury info their names & careers could be toast by association.

Trump has nothing to hide, the Dems would have crucified him years ago if he was guilty or on tape or anything dirty.

 

[Archie]

 

[jamesy2422]

The issue with releasing Epsteins call log is that there are HUNDREDS of names on there that did nothing wrong. Some might be just dudes Epstein called to solicite fundraising or charity donations.

If those names get linked to him via release of Federal investigation notes or Grand Jury info their names & careers could be toast by association.

Trump has nothing to hide, the Dems would have crucified him years ago if he was guilty or on tape or anything dirty.

i agree with this assessment

the call log does not prove guilt, esp if it is 1 or 2 calls

if there are a lot of calls though, the worst will be assumed

 

[jamesy2422]

Not a good look for Trump.

He should address this but probably thinks it's beneath him.

Also, I don't like the way the attorney posed that question.

What the fukk does socialize mean?

It's too broad and open for interpretations.

Should have asked him outright if he ever witnessed Trump or was in the presence of Trump having sex with underage girls.

He might have gotten a firm no for an answer instead of invoking his rights.

i dont like the question but whenever someone invokes those rights you know they are hiding something.

 

[Archie]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1950051375884173544

 

[BobbyFK]

The issue with releasing Epsteins call log is that there are HUNDREDS of names on there that did nothing wrong. Some might be just dudes Epstein called to solicite fundraising or charity donations.

If those names get linked to him via release of Federal investigation notes or Grand Jury info their names & careers could be toast by association.

Trump has nothing to hide, the Dems would have crucified him years ago if he was guilty or on tape or anything dirty.

I agree. All because someone spoke to him on the phone doesn't mean that person did anything wrong but that being said it wouldn't be a good look