Washington Commanders Is The Play Detroit Is Going To Lose

[flyingillini]

When Philly posts a play , posters get nervous because they know the majority of the time it hits. He is a force here and you must respect him as a man, a poster and a great humanitarian.

 

[justlooking]

Are you sure about that?

Since he doesn't have a single thread to keep track of all his picks, it's nearly impossible to tally his win/loss record and therefore no one knows if he has a winning record or not.

Sure, he had some good winning picks, but he also had total duds as well.

Maybe when I have some free time, I will check all his posts and see what his record is this year on posted picks. If I had to guess right top of my head, it isn't a winning record but we will see.

 

[justlooking]

When Philly posts a play , posters get nervous because they know the majority of the time it hits. He is a force here and you must respect him as a man, a poster and a great humanitarian.

By the way, isn't he the one who said the Raiders are getting slept on?

The Raiders sucked like the hell and that's the type of duds I'm talking about.

I mean if your picks are losses and they are close ones to the end of games, then I can understand but some of his picks were dead in the first quarter. Absolutely nothing against him, but I feel like that's what I've been seeing; not that I come here often and keep track of everything every minute.

 

[Archie]

I like it

 

[JDS]

By the way, isn't he the one who said the Raiders are getting slept on?

The Raiders sucked like the hell and that's the type of duds I'm talking about.

I mean if your picks are losses and they are close ones to the end of games, then I can understand but some of his picks were dead in the first quarter. Absolutely nothing against him, but I feel like that's what I've been seeing; not that I come here often and keep track of everything every minute.

You should've been fading me the last 6 months. Worse run of my betting career.

 

[Headsterx]

By the way, isn't he the one who said the Raiders are getting slept on?

The Raiders sucked like the hell and that's the type of duds I'm talking about.

I mean if your picks are losses and they are close ones to the end of games, then I can understand but some of his picks were dead in the first quarter. Absolutely nothing against him, but I feel like that's what I've been seeing; not that I come here often and keep track of everything every minute.

Hell yeah!

FADE ALERT!!!

 

[JDS]

Hell yeah!

FADE ALERT!!!

Did you put any of my fades in your thread across the street the last 6 months lol ?

 

[Headsterx]

Did you put any of my fades in your thread across the street the last 6 months lol ?

Nah, I’m rooting for you.

 

[JDS]

Nah, I’m rooting for you.

You’re a solid guy don’t let anybody tell you different. 🫡

 

[justlooking]

Pamela Maldonado's first bet: Commanders (+8.5) vs. Lions​

She is the biggest loser QUACK on ESPN. That's all I need to know.

 

[justlooking]

That idiot's pick on Ohio State vs Oregon was a loss and stupid ass ESPN put that shit on the Insider crap which you have to pay to see the losing pick. LMAO

Pamela Maldonado's pick: Ohio State-Oregon under 53.5 points

 

[justlooking]

Pamela Maldonado's first bet: Ohio State -9.5​

She also picked OSU -9.5 and the freaking line dropped. Obviously she is no sharp.

 

[Tanko]

That idiot's pick on Ohio State vs Oregon was a loss and stupid ass ESPN put that shit on the Insider crap which you have to pay to see the losing pick. LMAO

Pamela Maldonado's pick: Ohio State-Oregon under 53.5 points

Wait. What?
Not that I care about ESPN touts picks but you're saying ESPN now makes you pay for ESPN+ (insider) to see their picks????

Wow. I guess they think they are good at this stuff.

 

[justlooking]

Wait. What?
Not that I care about ESPN touts picks but you're saying ESPN now makes you pay for ESPN+ (insider) to see their picks????

Wow. I guess they think they are good at this stuff.

ESPN+ (insider) was always a pay access.

I used to have it so I could watch games only on ESPN+, but they kept on raising the subscription price so I cancelled it a couple of years ago. Things like the picks are now mostly on Insider where you have to pay to see and it's not like they are more right than wrong.

Honestly, my guess is that if you faded all their picks then you most likely made money. The fact that they have their own sportsbook is a conflict of interest. Give out bad picks and make money; what a concept.

 

[Tanko]

ESPN+ (insider) was always a pay access.

I used to have it so I could watch games only on ESPN+, but they kept on raising the subscription price so I cancelled it a couple of years ago. Things like the picks are now mostly on Insider where you have to pay to see and it's not like they are more right than wrong.

Honestly, my guess is that if you faded all their picks then you most likely made money. The fact that they have their own sportsbook is a conflict of interest. Give out bad picks and make money; what a concept.

I knew it cost $$$ but burying thier picks behind it is nuts. I've never really noticed it was behind the paywall. I have ESPN+ free with my Hulu subscription.

Thier picks should be outside the paywall. Why? Because they suck. Like you said, fading them would more profitable.

 

[phillyflyers]

Why are the books being so disrespectful to Washington?

+9.5? Really?

Do people understand that in order for Detroit to win games that Goff has to throw for 350+?

They can't win unless Goff is money. The Lions ain't the Eagles where Hurts can throw for 130 yards and the Eagles still win by 10+

Detroit isn't that.

Washington all day.

 

[justlooking]

Why are the books being so disrespectful to Washington?

+9.5? Really?

Do people understand that in order for Detroit to win games that Goff has to throw for 350+?

They can't win unless Goff is money. The Lions ain't the Eagles where Hurts can throw for 130 yards and the Eagles still win by 10+

Detroit isn't that.

Washington all day.

Who says Detroit has to throw a ton to win the game?

Detroit is a totally balanced team who can run and throw.

Detroit has Gibbs and now Montgomery is coming back and will play (where I would normally take against a team who has someone returning from an injury but it's when someons is rusty like a QB and not a RB).

Detroit is just a different kind of animal and they are focused to get to the SB. People talk about their defense being depleted, but they played just fine against Minnesota and beat them pretty handily in the 2nd half.

Washington is just happy that they made the playoffs in many years and they won a game. Honestly, if the idiot Mayfield doesn't cough up the ball in their own 13, Washington wouldn't be playing this weekend. Their aspiration isn't to get to the SB I'm sure. They are probably wondering how far they will get to in the playoffs and it ends this weekend.

After Washington lost by 17 in the first week, they didn't lose by more than 8 to anyone else for the season, so why then did the line open up at -8.5? To me, books want you to bet Washington.

 

[phillyflyers]

Who says Detroit has to throw a ton to win the game?

Detroit is a totally balanced team who can run and throw.

Detroit has Gibbs and now Montgomery is coming back and will play (where I would normally take against a team who has someone returning from an injury but it's when someons is rusty like a QB and not a RB).

Detroit is just a different kind of animal and they are focused to get to the SB. People talk about their defense being depleted, but they played just fine against Minnesota and beat them pretty handily in the 2nd half.

Washington is just happy that they made the playoffs in many years and they won a game. Honestly, if the idiot Mayfield doesn't cough up the ball in their own 13, Washington wouldn't be playing this weekend. Their aspiration isn't to get to the SB I'm sure. They are probably wondering how far they will get to in the playoffs and it ends this weekend.

After Washington lost by 17 in the first week, they didn't lose by more than 8 to anyone else for the season, so why then did the line open up at -8.5? To me, books want you to bet Washington.

I do not see Detroit as a balanced team in any way.

They are a pass heavy offense and if Goff is off they struggle bad.

Look at the game this year v Tampa when Tampa beat them.

Goff threw for over 300 yards but 0 td and 2 int.

They don't win if the QB is off.

 

[justlooking]

I do not see Detroit as a balanced team in any way.

They are a pass heavy offense and if Goff is off they struggle bad.

Look at the game this year v Tampa when Tampa beat them.

Goff threw for over 300 yards but 0 td and 2 int.

They don't win if the QB is off.

One game does not make a team.

The last 5 games Detroit played, these are the pass/run stats. It's too bad that Ben Johnson becomes a full retard and starts chucking every down when he is trailing like the track meet against the Bills but that's against the Bills and Washington isn't Buffalo.

Won 34-31 vs Packers
41 Passes & 34 Runs

Lost 42-48 vs Bills
59 Passes & 15 Runs

Won 34-17 vs Bears
32 Passes & 32 Runs

Won 40-34 vs 49ers
34 Passes & 33 Runs

Won 31-9 vs Vikings
33 Passes & 31 Runs

Also, it isn't just Goff. When any QB struggles, that team is toast just like Minnsota was toast when Darnold started to playing like his Jets days.

For all I know, you could be right and Washington wins SU but I just don't see it and that's why I have Detroit in my ML parlay. If it loses, then so be it but when was the last time #1 seed in a conference lost in a Divisional round? Probably never?

 

[justlooking]

Apparently, #1 seed losing in divisional round happened more than I would have thought. I would have to verify if the losers were indeed #1 seed though.

Green Bay Packers 2021 13-4 .765 Lost Divisional Round vs. 49ers, 10-13
Tennessee Titans 2021 12-5 .706 Lost Divisional Round vs. Bengals, 16-19
Baltimore Ravens 2019 14-2 .875 Lost Divisional Round vs. Titans, 12-28
Dallas Cowboys 2016 13-3 .813 Lost Divisional Round vs. Packers, 31-34
New York Giants 2008 12-4 .750 Lost Divisional Round vs. Eagles, 11-23
Los Angeles (San Diego) Chargers 2006 14-2 .875 Lost Divisional Round vs. Patriots, 21-24