There is a section of the bill that would limit gamblers to only being allowed to offset winnings with 90% of losses.
> You bet $100k and win.
> You get $100k and lose.
>>> You still owe taxes on $10k.
In the past everyone knows, losses could offset winning for tax purposes. With this bill only 90% of your losses can be used.
WTH?
Let's hope that section of the bill gets killed.
www.nbcsports.com
> You bet $100k and win.
> You get $100k and lose.
>>> You still owe taxes on $10k.
In the past everyone knows, losses could offset winning for tax purposes. With this bill only 90% of your losses can be used.
WTH?
Let's hope that section of the bill gets killed.
Senate's version of "big, beautiful bill" may have ugly side for gamblers
The so-called big, beautiful bill may lead to an ugly outcome for gamblers.
