Pair of 5s Sir MLB 2025

[pairof5ssir]

Selection

Nationals +139

 

[pairof5ssir]

Selection

Orioles +105

Recap Selections
Nationals +139
Orioles +105

 

[BMR Genie]

Selection

Nationals +139

Selection

Orioles +105

Recap Selections
Nationals +139
Orioles +105

Good luck today.

 

[pairof5ssir]

Results

Nationals +139 (L)
Orioles +105 (W)

 

[pairof5ssir]

Selections

Nationals +170
Twins +113

 

[Wagerallsports]

Results

Nationals +139 (L)
Orioles +105 (W)

Any profit is positive

 

[pairof5ssir]

Results

Nationals +170 (L)
Twins +113 (L)

 

[BMR Genie]

Bounced back today.

 

[pairof5ssir]

Selection

Cardinals F5 +0.5 -100 (2 units)

 

[Wagerallsports]

GL today sir

 

[Wagerallsports]

Winner?

Was the for first game?

 

[pairof5ssir]

Results

Cardinals F5 +0.5 -100 (2 units) (W)

 

[pairof5ssir]

Selection

Royals +140 (2 units)

 

[pairof5ssir]

Results

Royals +140 (2 units) (W)

 

[Pimike]

Results

Royals +140 (2 units) (W)

Bamm!!!

 

[pairof5ssir]

Selections

Orioles -139 (2 units)
Orioles -1.5 + 140

 

[pairof5ssir]

Results

Orioles -139 (2 units) (W)
Orioles -1.5 + 140 (W)

 

[pairof5ssir]

KVB, in a constructive way, posted that my unit count was not correct. I responded in kind. Below is my response to his post.

5's - The error is the following on your report. When I am selecting the favorite, example, April 15th MIN -103, I am betting 1.03 units to win 1 unit. You are showing betting 1 unit to win 0.97. There are numerous examples of discrepancy on favorites. Be reminded that when playing favorites, I am always betting more units to win one. For example, a 1 unit play on Team X at -113, I would be risking 1.13 units to win 1.

To be clear, I am never risking less than 1 unit on a favorite.

I am very anal about my unit count. It is clearly the only true metric in my mind that states your success or not. I have been doing this successfully for three decades.

Feel free to reach out. I applaud your dedication to keep the site legit and expose scamdicappeers.

 

[Pimike]

KVB, in a constructive way, posted that my unit count was not correct. I responded in kind. Below is my response to his post.

5's - The error is the following on your report. When I am selecting the favorite, example, April 15th MIN -103, I am betting 1.03 units to win 1 unit. You are showing betting 1 unit to win 0.97. There are numerous examples of discrepancy on favorites. Be reminded that when playing favorites, I am always betting more units to win one. For example, a 1 unit play on Team X at -113, I would be risking 1.13 units to win 1.

To be clear, I am never risking less than 1 unit on a favorite.

I am very anal about my unit count. It is clearly the only true metric in my mind that states your success or not. I have been doing this successfully for three decades.

Feel free to reach out. I applaud your dedication to keep the site legit and expose scamdicappeers.

I’ve known him for many years. He is always transparent on his count. If wrong it would be a mistake but never on purpose. Also KVB he has ALWAYS graded same way.

ok

let the man continue posting and most likely you tail you will be happy.

pair is a very honest and humble man.

 

[KVB]

I’ve known him for many years. He is always transparent on his count. If wrong it would be a mistake but never on purpose. Also KVB he has ALWAYS graded same way.

ok

let the man continue posting and most likely you tail you will be happy.

pair is a very honest and humble man.

You misunderstand.

Nobody ever questioned the honesty or integrity of Fives.

He’s like me, our tracking is very important and we hate mistakes.

I felt his way of updating the record is a little clumsy because you can’t see any past updates.

I also felt, if there was an error, he would want to know about it.

I tracked his record, both risking one unit on favorites and dogs, as well as laying for the favorite and risking one unit on the dog, to be sure.

No need to tell me to let the man continue posting, nobody’s telling him to stop. That’s simply not what this was about.

Fives is a good guy, no nonsense, and even if I thought he was making an error, I never thought it was intentional.