Now Is The Time To Bet The Eagles

[fishhead]

Eagles fans are thankful.

I'm a Raiders fan so he means nothing to me.

fuk

 

[phillyflyers]

fuk

If it makes you feel better, I'll be rooting for the Eagles in the playoffs out of all the teams left.

I hate them all but I hate the Eagles slightly less.

 

[phillyflyers]

Huh?

Really has nothing to do with my post you quoted unless you consider that the final score of the first game was a 5 point margin, lol.

If you didn't quote the wrong post, and meant to quote mine like you did, then your just a wierdo.

No I meant it.

Eagles won the first game by 5.

In Brazil.

Now the Fudgepack has to come to Philly and the line is 4.5?

The Eagles are going to kill this team.

 

[kostasmalina]

Do we really think the line is going to jump a couple of points if they announce Hurts is playing?

I think him playing could be built into the number.

I think it becomes more likely that if they announce he doesn't play, we could see the line drop, rather than if they announce him as playing moving the line very much higher.

I think it's most likely that they announce that he is starting, but, again, how much will that line really move?

Do you have an opinion on u/o here? I get a feeling passing won't be very popular early in this game.

 

[phillyflyers]

Do you have an opinion on u/o here? I get a feeling passing won't be very popular early in this game.

I expect the Eagles to put up 30+ themselves.

Green Bay D isn't stopping a fully healthy and rested Eagles O.

Hurts is playing. Sports radio here said he reported no symptoms at all after practice yesterday.

He's good.

Barkley in the playoffs might be insane.

 

[fishhead]

GB top notch DL.................D average beyond that.

 

[phillyflyers]

GB top notch DL.................D average beyond that.

Barkley had 109 yards rushing against them week 1.

I see no way Green Bay stops that offense.

 

[Wagerallsports]

In my opinion Philadelphia is the only NFC team that would beat Kansas City in a Super Bowl matchup if the Chiefs make it thru

 

[phillyflyers]

In my opinion Philadelphia is the only NFC team that would beat Kansas City in a Super Bowl matchup if the Chiefs make it thru

Agreed.

They beat KC in KC just last season.

Proven.

 

[KVB]

Do you have an opinion on u/o here? I get a feeling passing won't be very popular early in this game.

I would lean towards the OVER, could see 50 points this game.

 

[KVB]

But I still maintain that the premise of this thread could be wrong.

I think the line is counting on Hurts playing and if anything, should he be ruled out, we will see the line drop.

So if you're trying to beat the line based on a potential injury update, which is illadvised here, you might want to buy the Packers.

Because if you buy Philly at 4.5, and they say Hurts is playing, then you don't get much. But if you buy packers and they say Hurts is out, you will gain.

One thing to note is that Philly cut Ian Book, a backup QB who was on the active roster for the last two weeks of the season.

So with Hurts praciticing more and more through the end of the week and the QB getting cut, it sure looks like Hurts is playing Sunday.

 

[phillyflyers]

But I still maintain that the premise of this thread could be wrong.

I think the line is counting on Hurts playing and if anything, should he be ruled out, we will see the line drop.

So if you're trying to beat the line based on a potential injury update, which is illadvised here, you might want to buy the Packers.

Because if you buy Philly at 4.5, and they say Hurts is playing, then you don't get much. But if you buy packers and they say Hurts is out, you will gain.

One thing to note is that Philly cut Ian Book, a backup QB who was on the active roster for the last two weeks of the season.

So with Hurts praciticing more and more through the end of the week and the QB getting cut, it sure looks like Hurts is playing Sunday.

I already said he was playing.

Do you think I would come here and deliberately post false info?

I listen to sports talk here every day. They said two days he was playing.

Which I then posted here.

So the Eagles beat them by 5 in week 1 in Brazil when nobody was really in shape and all teams still working out the kinks but now the season is over 17 games later and a team the Eagles already handled is somehow not a bigger underdog than what they beat them by back in week 1?

I don't think this line indicates that Hurts is playing. I think it's assuming he's out until something official happens.

Even then, we already know Love isn't 100% and likely won't be on Sunday.

4.5 is clearly wrong. It should be 7+.

Radio just said he isn't cleared yet but at practice he was loud and in charge.

He's playing bro.

 

[KVB]

Yes, that's what I'm saying.

He is playing and that it is built into the line.

I think this is the wrong thinking...

Get it at -4.5 NOW!

Only reason it isn't more is because Hurts isn't cleared yet.

Once he clears, and he certainly will, that line is going to jump.

I think it's the other way. If he somehow doesn't clear protocol, that line could drop.

What happened in week 1 in Brazil really is, mostly, irrelevant. That's why I laughed when I said this...

unless you consider that the final score of the first game was a 5 point margin, lol.

 

[phillyflyers]

Yes, that's what I'm saying.

He is playing and that it is built into the line.

I think this is the wrong thinking...



I think it's the other way. If he somehow doesn't clear protocol, that line could drop.

What happened in week 1 in Brazil really is, mostly, irrelevant. That's why I laughed when I said this...

Yes I know what you think.

I disagreed.

How is it logical to say it's built in that he's playing, when they already beat them by more than that in another country but now Green Bay has to come to Philly?

 

[fishhead]

As stated earlier though, GB huge edge at HC

 

[KVB]

How is it logical to say it's built in that he's playing, when they already beat them by more than that in another country but now Green Bay has to come to Philly?

I already answered that...

What happened in week 1 in Brazil really is, mostly, irrelevant. That's why I laughed when I said this...

You really can't take to much from something that happened nearly a whole season ago in another country.

There has been a lot of football played since then, lol.

 

[KVB]

You really can't take to much from something that happened nearly a whole season ago in another country.

There has been a lot of football played since then, lol.

Philly, this might be why you are a little confused that this line wasn't higher. You think it should be 7, but reference the Brazil margin there and are trying to add some kind of home field advantage.

It doesn't really work that way, reagardless of the final result of the game.

 

[fishhead]

I already answered that...



You really can't take to much from something that happened nearly a whole season ago in another country.

There has been a lot of football played since then, lol.

PHILLY better now.

 

[phillyflyers]

Philly, this might be why you are a little confused that this line wasn't higher. You think it should be 7, but reference the Brazil margin there and are trying to add some kind of home field advantage.

It doesn't really work that way, reagardless of the final result of the game.

Incorrect.

Home team gets 3 points in every line.

So this means the Eagles are really only 1.5 point favs at home after beating them by 5 in another country?

Then you add to this illogical thinking by saying the line already has Hurts playing built in?

I think you're the one who's confused.

 

[KVB]

PHILLY better now.

Agreed.

I think both teams might be better now.

That was a season ago when they played, lol.

What do you think, is GB better now?

That's a worthy discussion.