stormtrooper8
stormtrooper8
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 30, 2022
- Messages
- 14,102
Bowl games are meaningless
I think there is a set of rules franzer.
it's never going to be perfect. but in many ways that makes it more fun.
in the end, it's just a game
Alabama was safely in because of schedule and win at Georgia during 1-loss regular season, came down to ND or Miami.I can't say I blame them they should be in the playoffs and not Alabama so not playing in a meaningless bowl game is something that I can't disagree with since they got screwed by the committee.
If it boiled down to the SEC Final between Georgia and Alabama , why did they overlook the result ? If the loss to Georgia wasnt going to factor in to the committee's decision , why play the game ? How does a 31 - 17 loss to Florida St ( 5 and 7 this season ) not matter if ND losing to Miami ( IN MIAMI ) does ?I am not commenting on Notre Dame's decision not to play in Bowl, but I could see argument either way regarding Playoff. Committee argument is teams had almost identical resumes and Miami beat Notre Dame head-to-head, and I guess that is valid. BUT Notre Dame was clearly the better team the second half of the year and would be favored on neutral field if they met again. In fact, ND finished 10-0 after starting 0-2. So committee is weighing entire season equally, which included Miami win on opening week, and not giving added weight to how teams finished. Right or wrong, I am not sure.
Miami/ND matters more because overall resumes of those teams were so close. Alabama faced much tougher schedule than either of those two schools and won AT Georgia, that more than offsets FSU loss. We are also comparing a 1-loss team (regular season) with two 2-loss teams.If it boiled down to the SEC Final between Georgia and Alabama , why did they overlook the result ? If the loss to Georgia wasnt going to factor in to the committee's decision , why play the game ? How does a 31 - 17 loss to Florida St ( 5 and 7 this season ) not matter if ND losing to Miami ( IN MIAMI ) does ?
Sorry , but an SEC team skipping over a better team from another conference , seems to happen a lot. if ALL games on a schedule were truly taken into account , Florida St whipping Bama should matter more then a very close loss at Miami imo.
Bottom line.... ND were screwed over. I would also tell the NCAA to stick the lower tier bowl game that would put $$ in their corrupt pockets.
Alabama had 3 losses. Notre Dame won 10 straight and clobbered most teams on route. The only way you give Alabama the nod with 3 losses is giving further weight to the SEC schedule. THATS the point im making. Why is the SEC given more credibility , that losses in that conference are better then other conferences. Why even bother to pretend your taking ALL games into account. If you lose by 14 points to a team that finished 5 and 7 , why do you discard that result ? N.Dame lost by a total of 4 points against 2 Playoff teams.Miami/ND matters more because overall resumes of those teams were so close. Alabama faced much tough schedule than either of those two schools and won AT Georgia, that more than offsets FSU loss. We are also comparing a 1-loss team (regular season) with two 2-loss teams.
Oops I forgot Alabama had second regular season loss. Does not change anything else I said though. SEC gets benefit of the doubt because conference IS better, especially in this case comparing to ACC and Indie. Yes, ND had two close losses to playoff teams, but their quality of wins was not as good as Bama's. So I don't think Tide even belongs in this conversation, came down to Miami/ND.Alabama had 3 losses. Notre Dame won 10 straight and clobbered most teams on route. The only way you give Alabama the nod with 3 losses is giving further weight to the SEC schedule. THATS the point im making. Why is the SEC given more credibility , that losses in that conference are better then other conferences. Why even bother to pretend your taking ALL games into account. If you lose by 14 points to a team that finished 5 and 7 , why do you discard that result ? N.Dame lost by a total of 4 points against Playoff teams.
Why are you continually dismissing a 31 - 17 loss to Florida St ? You mention their " Body of Work " within the SEC , and ignore the out of conference beating to a 5 - 7 team. Notre Dame lost by FOUR total points to 2 playoff teams. If you want to just look at wins , and ignore the loss , whats the point of a selection committee ? For the record , i agree with the BMR poll that had Bama left out by a landslide. It was just Corruption as usual by the NCAAOops I forgot Alabama had second regular season loss. Does not change anything else I said though. SEC gets benefit of the doubt because conference IS better, especially in this case comparing to ACC and Indie. Yes, ND had two close losses to playoff teams, but their quality of wins was not as good as Bama's. So I don't think Tide even belongs in this conversation, came down to Miami/ND.
Because they had many more good wins than one bad loss. And even ignoring everything I said, Alabama would be favored over both MIA and ND. ND would be favored of Miami too, so if bookmakers set the field, Miami would be out.Why are you continually dismissing a 31 - 17 loss to Florida St ? You mention their " Body of Work " within the SEC , and ignore the out of conference beating to a 5 - 7 team. Notre Dame lost by FOUR total points to 2 playoff teams. If you want to just look at wins , and ignore the loss , whats the point of a selection committee ? For the record , i agree with the BMR poll that had Bama left out by a landslide. It was just Corruption as usual by the NCAA