lol make sense as most of the gender reveal party end up with accidents.i thought it was a gender reveal party
Note to self: If I decide to go streaking at NFL game make sure it’s not on Bobby Wagner’s sideline
- Thread starter BigJay
- Start date
lol make sense as most of the gender reveal party end up with accidents.i thought it was a gender reveal party
Players should have just let the security handle his job. I think this could fall to physical assault.Let's think this this through
Is it possible he has a case?
The players aren't security or affiliated with the stadium
Good point.Players we're not trespassing, pink smoke flamer was as soon as he stepped onto the field. Trespasser stopped in his trackd by Good Samaritan. I think the GS law would apply
sure they have a case if they want it. but because of the racial dynamics and nfl influence i doubt they will charge him. the mccloskeys only brandished guns at a mob outside their house that was trespassing and broke down the gate to their private community. they were criminally charged and plead guilty to a lesser crime.Let's think this this through
Is it possible he has a case?
The players aren't security or affiliated with the stadium
Good point also. Now i don't know what to believe anymore. But I have something to say on the last sentences - The judge will always act in accordance with the law and not to what they think was right.If you are breaking into someone's home, does the victims neighbor have the right to shoot you from across the street?
I think not and the security officers have the legal right to put their hands on and detain the person, but the players do not
I guess it just depends on the judge and if they go strictly by the law or what they think was right
there is no way that is true.He has no case
He impeded the players right to earn a living by trespassing & causing a public nuisance.
If you are in commission of a crime you are not entitled to compensation from injury
The schools insurer paid outthere is no way that is true.
"In the lesser-known case, an 18-year-old climbed onto a roof at a Redding, Calif., high school in 1982 to steal a $35 floodlight. The young man fell 27 feet through the skylight and was permanently disabled. His lawyers obtained a $260,000 up-front settlement with the school district’s insurer, plus $1,500 a month, for the rest of the man’s life."
that was 40 years ago. im sure its even worse now.
Non violent?it doesnt matter if you are breaking the law. you are only allowed to use appropriate force and the guy was a non violent trespasser. police can definitely be sued by criminals for excessive force.
im sure their disclaimer protects them against some negligence but even the article says that it doesnt protect them from extreme negligence. i doubt the disclaimer protects them from liability for intentional assault. if wagner tore off the guys legs to stop him from running would that be fine too? after a certain amount of force it is definitely illegal.Non violent?
He charged the sideline w a fukking flare on fire in his pants 1 week after a dude literally lit himself on fire on a tennis court in front of Federer.
Appropriate force lol
There's 2 types of force, lethal and non lethal. That's all that matters as far as the law is concerned. That homeboy made it to jail alive is all Wagner had to worry about, had he died it would have been self defense as what occurred was certainly not driven by motive, provoked or encouraged by Wagner and the trespasser had no right to be in the pretense of Wagner, and even signed a contract pledging not to.
![]()
Injuries at Daytona Speedway Raise Questions about Sporting Event Tickets and Liability Disclaimers
Sporting Event Tickets and Liability More than 30 people were injured at Daytona International Speedway last month when a wreck involving two NASCAR racers caused debris to shoot into a crowd of spectators.lawteam.com
Hypothetically speaking, if he tore off his legs that would be manslaughter....because dude would die.im sure their disclaimer protects them against some negligence but even the article says that it doesnt protect them from extreme negligence. i doubt the disclaimer protects them from liability for intentional assault. if wagner tore off the guys legs to stop him from running would that be fine too? after a certain amount of force it is definitely illegal.
well he could always say concussion. wagner definitely came after the guy not the other way around.Hypothetically speaking, if he tore off his legs that would be manslaughter....because dude would die.
But what damages does dude have here? Who is the provocative party?
Who beached the terms of their ticket?
Who charged at who?
Who had a flame emiting from their pants?
See where the logic goes here?
Wagner came after him?well he could always say concussion. wagner definitely came after the guy not the other way around.
do you honestly think if this was a blm protester at a trump rally with the same ticket disclaimer, and some guy with a confederate flag came and headbutted him unconscious in the 49ers stadium that he wouldnt be charged with a crime and lose?
the mccloskeys only brandished guns at a mob that broke down their private community gate and trespassed at their house and had to plead guilty.