No, not gambling records un ranked teams beating ranked teams is the second most in NCAA history.
But gambling records matter, bruh, that's all the matters. The clip at which the unranked teams are winning is only one thing, but the ROI on betting them and units won or loss across all of them, can show something else, even though we don't bet all of them. Then we can break it down by conference, and get even more granular. We can to only the ones predicted in the Forecasts as well, which is even more valuable.
It's true though, this year if a bettor had risked the same unit on every unranked team's moneyline when the play a ranked team (home and away) that bettor would be down about -35 units overall, with an ROI of about -7.9%.
Last year, the other outlying high win percentage for unranked teams vs ranked would have yielded that same bettor about -112 units, with an ROI of about -22.3%
This year feels different, that's for sure.
In 2017-18, the clip was a relatively normal 23.4% but the ROI while risking the same unit on every unranked team to beat the ranked team was as little as -1% and a loss of about -6 units.
The ROI here can really vary. In the 2008-09 season, that same bettor actually won about +8.5 units with an ROI of about 1.5%.
The payouts were so big they eclipsed the vigorish over all 597 games.
I could go on. In the last 20 years we've seen that ROI on every game go from that +1.5% season to a -35% season, with everything in between.
But this looks to be the best 3rd best year in the last 20 ROI wise with that -7.9%, risking the same unit, behind the -1% and +1.5%.
![Hat tip :hattip: :hattip:](https://images-bmrforum-production-409396115112.s3.amazonaws.com/smilies/v1/hattip.gif)