Last time I checked Texas won 1-0 that’s only 1 winner. They didn’t play twice. If you would have played them at +1.5 than it would have been 2 winners. I’m watching you.
Last time I checked Texas won 1-0 that’s only 1 winner. They didn’t play twice. If you would have played them at +1.5 than it would have been 2 winners. I’m watching you.
His plays look clean. He indicated he bet Texas early in the morning and then again late in the day.
If you look at the line moves, they were -110ish fav in the morning and a +110 dog in the afternoon.
Looks like he was just padding his play with a 2nd bet with more favorable odds.
I do this a lot too when the line gives me even better odds.
I would disagree. If he had lost with Texas, I would have expected him to count it as two losses. That is how I would count the plays in my thread. Two different odds = two different plays.
Really what matters is his units. W/L record is nice but cummulative units tell the story.
I would disagree. If he had lost with Texas, I would have expected him to count it as two losses. That is how I would count the plays in my thread. Two different odds = two different plays.
Really what matters is his units. W/L record is nice but cummulative units tell the story.
Thats what I did. If it had been same odds it would have been adding on to same bet. I was surprised to get the better odds later in the day. But I have no problem counting either way. Its not that big of a deal to me.
Last time I checked Texas won 1-0 that’s only 1 winner. They didn’t play twice. If you would have played them at +1.5 than it would have been 2 winners. I’m watching you.
I understand your point, and since it doesn't change my money, I can count it either way. I would not have put more on it, if not for the improved odds.
GL to you today!
I understand your point, and since it doesn't change my money, I can count it either way. I would not have put more on it, if not for the improved odds.
GL to you today!