Skip to content

King Arthur Is The Prophesied Anti-Christ Of The Bible

Top Sportsbooks

9.9

Bovada

75% Cash Bonus
Read Review
9.8

BetOnline

100% Free Play
Read Review
9.6

Heritage Sports

100% Free Play Bonus
Read Review
9.6

BetAnySports

30% Cash Bonus
Read Review
9.5

Everygame

100% Cash Bonus
Read Review
9.5

Bookmaker

25% Cash Bonus
Read Review

phillyflyers

phillyflyers

Joined
Aug 8, 2024
Messages
7,389
Philly is going nuts again, right?

Before you say that, let's explore this for a second calmly, rationally, and intelligently.

King Arthur is recorded as a Celtic British king who fought against the Saxon invaders.

It is said that Arthur was killed in the Battle of Camlann against his nephew, Mordred who was also killed by Arthur.

Arthur was said to have a received "a mortal wound."

After his death, Arthur was said to be taken to the Isle of Avalon, to heal.

The parallels to the biblical Anti-Christ are astonishing.

Let's compare.

Arthur:

Was said to be the "once and future king."

Received a mortal wound. Taken to Avalon to be healed. Will return.

Royal/Occult bloodlines invoked.

Uniting Britain, then the world.

Symbolism: Red Dragon, resurrection.

Now let's compare this to the Biblical Anti-Christ:

Receives a mortal wound, is "miraculously" healed. Returns.

Is called "The beast that was, is not, will come."

Myths used to deceive.

Royal/Occult lineage predicted.

One World Government.

Symbolism: Beast, false resurrection.

I'll follow this up in even more detail later on, but this should suffice for now.
 

phillyflyers

phillyflyers

Joined
Aug 8, 2024
Messages
7,389
He's not recorded as anything other than fiction. He didn't exist.
Absolutely disagree.

Early sources mention a figure named Arthur in post-Roman Britain.

Additionally, there actually was a Roman commander in Britain named Lucius Artorius Castus who commanded two British Legions. This is historical fact.

Arthur being the English derivative of the Latin Artorius.

Moreover, at Tintagel Castle in England, a rock was found bearing the name Artorius. This has come to be known as the Arthur Stone.
 

flyingillini

flyingillini

Joined
Jul 25, 2022
Messages
21,589
  • In the story of Onan, found in Genesis 38, Onan is instructed to have sexual relations with his brother's widow to provide offspring for his brother, as per the levirate custom.
  • Onan deliberately avoids conceiving a child by spilling his semen on the ground, rather than allowing it to impregnate Tamar.
  • The Bible describes Onan's actions as "wicked" and God kills him for it.
 

MinnesotaFats

MinnesotaFats

Joined
Nov 1, 2021
Messages
5,038
  • In the story of Onan, found in Genesis 38, Onan is instructed to have sexual relations with his brother's widow to provide offspring for his brother, as per the levirate custom.
  • Onan deliberately avoids conceiving a child by spilling his semen on the ground, rather than allowing it to impregnate Tamar.
  • The Bible describes Onan's actions as "wicked" and God kills him for it.
Next time a gal demands I pull out I'll remind her it's "wicked"
 

MinnesotaFats

MinnesotaFats

Joined
Nov 1, 2021
Messages
5,038
Absolutely disagree.

Early sources mention a figure named Arthur in post-Roman Britain.

Additionally, there actually was a Roman commander in Britain named Lucius Artorius Castus who commanded two British Legions. This is historical fact.

Arthur being the English derivative of the Latin Artorius.

Moreover, at Tintagel Castle in England, a rock was found bearing the name Artorius. This has come to be known as the Arthur Stone.
Early sources?

Yeah, called 'fables'

Fake dude, just like Dread Pirate Roberts
 

flyingillini

flyingillini

Joined
Jul 25, 2022
Messages
21,589
Early sources?

Yeah, called 'fables'

Fake dude, just like Dread Pirate Roberts
Ross is a modern day hero. I used to converse with him on the SR message boards. He was legendary. It’s great he’s free. He’s a hero to all. I lived exactly 1 mile from the cafe he was arrested in in SF. Ross for President !
 

phillyflyers

phillyflyers

Joined
Aug 8, 2024
Messages
7,389
The "Legend" of King Arthur is a fable, written hundreds of years after the Saxon invasions, to merely propagate pride as the Tudors & Plantagenists battled for Britannia.

It wasn't a very peaceful era you know what the back stabbing kingdoms & black plague.
Are you going to give some evidence other than your opinion?

Lucius Artorius Castus was real and lived. The Arthur Stone is real. Nennius wrote Historia Brittonum featuring Arthur.

All these are real and all I've seen from you is "it's fake bro."
 

JDS

JDS

Joined
Dec 11, 2021
Messages
52,628
Philly is going nuts again, right?

Before you say that, let's explore this for a second calmly, rationally, and intelligently.

King Arthur is recorded as a Celtic British king who fought against the Saxon invaders.

It is said that Arthur was killed in the Battle of Camlann against his nephew, Mordred who was also killed by Arthur.

Arthur was said to have a received "a mortal wound."

After his death, Arthur was said to be taken to the Isle of Avalon, to heal.

The parallels to the biblical Anti-Christ are astonishing.

Let's compare.

Arthur:

Was said to be the "once and future king."

Received a mortal wound. Taken to Avalon to be healed. Will return.

Royal/Occult bloodlines invoked.

Uniting Britain, then the world.

Symbolism: Red Dragon, resurrection.

Now let's compare this to the Biblical Anti-Christ:

Receives a mortal wound, is "miraculously" healed. Returns.

Is called "The beast that was, is not, will come."

Myths used to deceive.

Royal/Occult lineage predicted.

One World Government.

Symbolism: Beast, false resurrection.

I'll follow this up in even more detail later on, but this should suffice for now.
What does your AI say about this topic ?
 
Top