This is true about the college fan base, but Clark turned that upside down with her road game sellouts. That difference is economically accounted for, the built in base is not some great revelation.
But when it comes to the WNBA a team like Connecticut will see a bump in sales when former Uconn players come to town to play.
So some of the college fan base, at least among the most successful women, does translate to WNBA. This is proven.
Absolutely - everyone wanted to see the latest/greatest - road games are a 1 time a season visit. How was attendance at Non Iowa games though at other schools though.
I think the WNBA will trend positive vs its trajectory lately. But the people thinking it’s gonna explode and become lead to sell outs all year long everywhere are way over hyping it.
I’m not questioning the legitimacy of the sport - they obviously have very good players and adding another with a marketable image is only going to help. But there also needs to be some reality checks in place - they have a chance to boost popularity - keep doing things like holding basketball clinics with local schools - keep your players out in the public doing good and not making headlines for the WRONG reasons. Would seem fairly easy to do when you look at how the NBA has plenty of knuckleheads doing the wrong thing.
Headlines like the Nike deal though set wrong expectations - that shoe money is like an non guaranteed NFL player contract - best case you live up to it and get it all. But it can also fall well short to - the deal projects sales with the player getting a % of sales. What happens when people refuse to pay $200 for a woman’s basketball shoe ? Worse - what happens if they try to bring out a line of sports wear with her name that flops badly? There’s a precendent for both.
She of course will be fine financially - but someone’s going to loose their ass here I’m afraid and if the league banks too much on her it could easily do more harm than good. Balance is the key.