Not disagreeing on either - but the first poster mentioned pretty much exemplifies what I’ve said here - you start with that outlandish and personal attacks - you lose the audience.
Brock - well, I’m quite sure there’s a reason he’s posting here. It’s more fake reality that draws eyeballs. He plays the heel quite well on these forums. I mean let’s be logical and real for a minute here - if there was truly any bad blood - you wouldn’t see him on here.
Yea he’s a scammer - he’s got a history of posting about it. At the same time - when you trust this guy with money - there’s got to be some reason you’re doing it. No semi sane person would trust an admitted scam artist with a cent unless there was something in it for them. Would most posters on here trust another with any significant sum of cash or their account info just out of kindness ? Unlikely as most are smart enough to not trust everyone. Now to suggest there was that level of trust in someone who posted about his scams?
There is more to the story than what we know about - end of the day it’s between the 2 parties involved. If one has the power to do something and doesn’t - not my monkeys/not my circus. Way too many would be scammers out there who haven’t been as transparent with their track record for me to worry about out those who are.
There’s got to be more than one poster stirring the pot and there needs to be someone to play the antihero to keep viewership up. It gets boring fast when you just have a much of guys talking sports. Some of this is just made up personas and some of it is just over exaggerations of them. I tend to not be in either camp - just call them as I see them and know enough to not get suckered into forum fights that are un-winnable.
