for me, i feel like the warriors may be the smart play cause it's always safe to stay on curry's side, plus they will be at home. but i will say, boston has shown resiliency this postseason when it comes to redeeming themselves. they have not lost 2 games in a row. warriors have also been inconsistent outside of curry. you could argue the same about tatum, but he picks it up after a loss. i have to take +4 with boston
for me, i feel like the warriors may be the smart play cause it's always safe to stay on curry's side, plus they will be at home. but i will say, boston has shown resiliency this postseason when it comes to redeeming themselves. they have not lost 2 games in a row. warriors have also been inconsistent outside of curry. you could argue the same about tatum, but he picks it up after a loss. i have to take +4 with boston
I think Boston needs to change their defense up. They are basically asking Steph Curry to destroy them every game with their drop coverage. And he's doing it -- because he's Steph Curry
If the Celtics are so good at defense, then they should just play their normal switch-heavy scheme and force the Warriors' role players to step up.
Ime said they're going to come into Game 5 with the same strategy they've been using. So I'd expect 30+ from Curry again regardless of the game outcome.
Tatum has also been on the face of a lot of products lately seemed to happen right after he had that 60 point game but he hasn't really proven much after that