Are Women More Attracted To Married Men?

[phillyflyers]

Yes!

These shystie bitches deliberately target the property of other women. Yes they do.

If a dude is good looking, with money, and has a ring in his hand, he will be drowning in pussy.

Because that's what women do.

 

[sunshine11]

did you take a survey?

 

[phillyflyers]

did you take a survey?

Years of experience.

 

[jjgold]

no idea

I get no pay regardless

 

[europro]

Flyers youre reading way too many books my brotha

 

[BMR Genie]

no idea

I get no pay regardless

This means you just need to wear a ring and you'll be attracted to women. It's your last chance, JJ.

 

[jjgold]

That’s a good idea Genie thank you

 

[phillyflyers]

It's just that women are devious creatures by nature.

They will deliberately target a married man just because.

Especially if he's got some loot. Shit, they'll fukk him in front of his wife.

 

[BMR Genie]

Google has a good explanation.

"Women may be attracted to married men due to the "wedding ring effect," where a ring symbolizes proven stability, emotional maturity, and commitment, making the man appear pre-vetted. Other reasons include the excitement of a forbidden thrill, the desire for attention without full commitment, or a psychological preference for a partner who is already validated by another woman."

But, remember... It takes 2 to tango.

 

[phillyflyers]

Google has a good explanation.

"Women may be attracted to married men due to the "wedding ring effect," where a ring symbolizes proven stability, emotional maturity, and commitment, making the man appear pre-vetted. Other reasons include the excitement of a forbidden thrill, the desire for attention without full commitment, or a psychological preference for a partner who is already validated by another woman."

But, remember... It takes 2 to tango.

In other words, women are whores.

 

[BMR Genie]

In other words, women are whores.

I think you forgot to read this part: "But, remember... It takes 2 to tango."

 

[phillyflyers]

I think you forgot to read this part: "But, remember... It takes 2 to tango."

Sure but who is going after who?

A woman knows a married man is off limits.

They still go after him.

So this new woman throws her pussy in front of him, and what do you expect a man to do?

Say no?

 

[JDS]

This means you just need to wear a ring and you'll be attracted to women. It's your last chance, JJ.

I might try this Genie, sneaky smart

 

[JDS]

I think you forgot to read this part: "But, remember... It takes 2 to tango."

Genie holding her own in this debate.

 

[jjgold]

The bottom line get involved, the those type of relationships. It destroys your life.


Chaos life

 

[BMR Genie]

Genie holding her own in this debate.

We can go 10 pages in this thread with Philly regarding the women topic, and he will never listen to what I say or try to understand my point. It's useless.

I'm not defending women who choose this path. He can call them whatever he wants.

In an illicit affair, you cannot just hold the woman criminally liable, both participants (the unfaithful spouse and their paramour) should be held criminally liable.

 

[JDS]

We can go 10 pages in this thread with Philly regarding the women topic, and he will never listen to what I say or try to understand my point. It's useless.

I'm not defending women who choose this path. He can call them whatever he wants.

In an illicit affair, you cannot just hold the woman criminally liable, both participants (the unfaithful spouse and their paramour) should be held criminally liable.

Reasonable human beings would agree with this notion.

 

[phillyflyers]

We can go 10 pages in this thread with Philly regarding the women topic, and he will never listen to what I say or try to understand my point. It's useless.

I'm not defending women who choose this path. He can call them whatever he wants.

In an illicit affair, you cannot just hold the woman criminally liable, both participants (the unfaithful spouse and their paramour) should be held criminally liable.

Instead of criticizing me, why don't you debate the actual points?

I rebutted you precisely, you respond with I'll never understand lol.

I understood your point. You didn't respond to mine.

You're saying they're both responsible which is correct. However, the woman knew the man is married. She still pursues him. She is the initiator.

Furthermore, men are programmed by nature to not refuse pussy. It's how the species survives. If a woman throws it in his face, she's going to get fukked. Period.

This is why you see 400 pound -- females walking around with 13 kids by 11 different men.

So once again, while both parties are at fault, it is the woman who pursued and initiated it and that makes her more responsible than the man.

 

[BMR Genie]

Instead of criticizing me, why don't you debate the actual points?

I rebutted you precisely, you respond with I'll never understand lol.

I understood your point. You didn't respond to mine.

You're saying they're both responsible which is correct. However, the woman knew the man is married. She still pursues him. She is the initiator.

Furthermore, men are programmed by nature to not refuse pussy. It's how the species survives. If a woman throws it in his face, she's going to get fukked. Period.

This is why you see 400 pound -- females walking around with 13 kids by 11 different men.

So once again, while both parties are at fault, it is the woman who pursued and initiated it and that makes her more responsible than the man.

The initiator is a woman, the reactor is a man. If the married man is strong enough to refuse temptation because he has principles and loves his wife/family so much, this isn't even going to happen, even if the woman is naked in front of him. It's like in an engine, "ignition without power is useless" -> no matter how much the women try, if the man doesn't give in/entertain, there's nothing.

 

[BMR Genie]

Instead of criticizing me, why don't you debate the actual points?

I rebutted you precisely, you respond with I'll never understand lol.

I understood your point. You didn't respond to mine.

You're saying they're both responsible which is correct. However, the woman knew the man is married. She still pursues him. She is the initiator.

Furthermore, men are programmed by nature to not refuse pussy. It's how the species survives. If a woman throws it in his face, she's going to get fukked. Period.

This is why you see 400 pound -- females walking around with 13 kids by 11 different men.

So once again, while both parties are at fault, it is the woman who pursued and initiated it and that makes her more responsible than the man.

"So once again, while both parties are at fault, it is the woman who pursued and initiated it and that makes her more responsible than the man."

--> In the eyes of the law, both are equally liable, no matter what the level of participation is.