This is unreal, weed smokers be careful out there.

[flyingillini]

Marilyn Manson finishes New Hampshire community service sentence for blowing nose on concert videographer

Musical artist Marilyn Manson finished his sentence of 20 hours of community service for blowing his nose on a videographer at a concert in New Hampshire in 2019.

www.foxnews.com

How in the hell did she get off of this????????????????

 

[BMR Genie]

The article and the video played on that page are 2 different things. I got confused for a while.

But damn! No jail time for stabbing 108x? WTF!

 

[flyingillini]

The article and the video played on that page are 2 different things. I got confused for a while.

But damn! No jail time for stabbing 108x? WTF!

It is crazy, can't believe it. I hope someone of that guys family goes after her and she gets what she deserves.

 

[BMR Genie]

Is weed legal in CA? It's so scary to legalize or have free access to everyone if this is the effect.

 

[JDS]

99.9 % of the time marijuana doesn’t have this effect on people. This is a rare case, I didn’t read the story, but if she is schizophrenic and smoking marijuana, then that’s a bad combination.

 

[BMR Genie]

California audiologist who stabbed boyfriend 108 times in ‘cannabis-induced psychosis’ gets a slap on the wrist

“There is no winner in this tragedy,” said Brendan O’Melia, the victim’s uncle. “There can be, however, accountability.”

nypost.com

"Under California law, a person is seen as responsible for their actions when impaired by drugs or alcohol unless their intoxication is involuntary. "

 

[jjgold]

Marijuana didn’t cause that. That was just an excuse.

 

[Tanko]

So, cool. If I want to knock someone off... here's the plan.

Do the deed, quickly smoke some weed, claim I was in a drug stupor, walk away free. Plan for next victim.

Got it.

 

[flyingillini]

Is weed legal in CA? It's so scary to legalize or have free access to everyone if this is the effect.

It is not the effect at all, I can't believe she got off. Anyone that believes this needs their head examined.

 

[Tanko]

It is not the effect at all, I can't believe she got off. Anyone that believes this needs their head examined.

Agreed. And they said this occured after TWO HITS on a bong. Unless she was sucking on that thing for 30-40 seconds each hit (not likely since she said it was her first experience with weed), this is complete BS.

 

[BMR Genie]

Only a doctor can testify if she's indeed under the influence of the "cannabis-induced psychosis" during the crime, right? How are you going to prove this as a doctor if let's say this is the first time she uses it? What is she's just lying for an alibi?

 

[Tanko]

Only a doctor can testify if she's indeed under the influence of the "cannabis-induced psychosis" during the crime, right? How are you going to prove this as a doctor if let's say this is the first time she uses it? What is she's just lying for an alibi?

Any doctor who examined her would have done so weeks if not months later and there is no way they would have been able to tell if psychosis occured.

An expert could come in and say some BS about how psychosis occurs 1 in a 100,000 cases with weed. If the jury/judge agreed with that and thought it brought in reasonable doubt, than no one who is stoned can ever be convicted of murder due to reasonable doubt. Ever.

 

[Tanko]

Note: She was convicted by a jury. But, it was only of manslaughter, not murder. I'm guessing due to the "psychosis" defense. The judge still could have thrown her in jail for manslaughter but didn't. The jury and judge should all be shot by someone who is stoned.... The irony would be, the person who did it shouldn't be thrown in jail since the victims believe its not warranted.

 

[BMR Genie]

Any doctor who examined her would have done so weeks if not months later and there is no way they would have been able to tell if psychosis occured.

An expert could come in and say some BS about how psychosis occurs 1 in a 100,000 cases with weed. If the jury/judge agreed with that and thought it brought in reasonable doubt, than no one who is stoned can ever be convicted of murder due to reasonable doubt. Ever.

Exactly, Tank. Like for real, how are they going to prove this? Unless she has already recorded medical history.

 

[BMR Genie]

Note: She was convicted by a jury. But, it was only of manslaughter, not murder. I'm guessing due to the "psychosis" defense. The judge still could have thrown her in jail for manslaughter but didn't. The jury and judge should all be shot by someone who is stoned.... The irony would be, the person who did it shouldn't be thrown in jail since the victims believe its not warranted.

They need to make changes to their law for this or the same crime will repeat in the future with no prison time.

 

[keithrichard]

99.9 % of the time marijuana doesn’t have this effect on people. This is a rare case, I didn’t read the story, but if she is schizophrenic and smoking marijuana, then that’s a bad combination.

I don't know anything about this case but I believe marijuana and schizophrenia are definitely a bad combination. I know from real life experience.

 

[JDS]

I don't know anything about this case but I believe marijuana and schizophrenia are definitely a bad combination. I know from real life experience.

Yeah I've heard some horror stories myself.

 

[keithrichard]

While I believe it's a bad combination I would be very skeptical of it causing a violent reaction like in her case. I have had family history with schizophrenia and believe me it's like living a nightmare.

 

[pipe]

I call bullshit. Someone she knows who knows that judge.

 

[jjgold]

That was a bizarre story, many say, if you don’t smoke weed, you’re a jerk off