Texas Rangers +170

[pete0]

because 3+7 = 10

 

[Wagerallsports]

Win or lose today, they are too good to be that big of a dog

GL pete

 

[KVB]

Agreed Wager, across many types of handicapping you can see value with Texas today. Virtually every method yields a no vig line less the 170.

Some know that I make a public gauge that isn't really predictive but assesses the public impression of the game, at it's lowest level, it gives a know vig line of -169/+169. That line does tend to line up with openers in other sports.

Many believe that line was off market today.

Good Luck Pete.

 

[stormtrooper8]

Let's see if they can cash in here in the 4th

 

[jjgold]

Not looking good but Texas explosive

 

[stormtrooper8]

Back in it

 

[pete0]

Agreed Wager, across many types of handicapping you can see value with Texas today. Virtually every method yields a no vig line less the 170.

Some know that I make a public gauge that isn't really predictive but assesses the public impression of the game, at it's lowest level, it gives a know vig line of -169/+169. That line does tend to line up with openers in other sports.

Many believe that line was off market today.

Good Luck Pete.

@KVB

Which books should i be comparing about the part where u described once,
if a book is holding -130 and not going past it. (rec book) compared to a "sharp" book going -140
does that mean the fav. is the right play?

which particular markets/books should i compare to be rec / sharp ??