For you stat guys or anyone else with knowledge of the topic..... What is a good long-term +CLV % in College Football (or NFL)?
Over the last few years for CFB, I've had a CLV % ranging from +0% to +5%. I've been hitting 54-58% of my CFB plays during that time and have been fortunate enough to end up +units (barely) each year. So far this year I've beaten the closing lines by an avg of 0.5 pts and 58% of my plays with a +CLV % of +3%.
I'm not bragging, because there's not a lot to brag about. I'm just laying data out for discussion.
To be clear, I'm talking about the +CLV %, not the number of games I'm beating the closing line. Beating the closing line (spreads/ML) doesn't always mean you will win and vice versa is true too. But, long-term if you are beating the closing lines, you should be winning and result in a +CLV %.
I've been studying a lot on the topic of CLV and I'd like people's take on what is a good +CLV%
Hopefully, this will lead to an informative discussion.
Over the last few years for CFB, I've had a CLV % ranging from +0% to +5%. I've been hitting 54-58% of my CFB plays during that time and have been fortunate enough to end up +units (barely) each year. So far this year I've beaten the closing lines by an avg of 0.5 pts and 58% of my plays with a +CLV % of +3%.
I'm not bragging, because there's not a lot to brag about. I'm just laying data out for discussion.
To be clear, I'm talking about the +CLV %, not the number of games I'm beating the closing line. Beating the closing line (spreads/ML) doesn't always mean you will win and vice versa is true too. But, long-term if you are beating the closing lines, you should be winning and result in a +CLV %.
I've been studying a lot on the topic of CLV and I'd like people's take on what is a good +CLV%
Hopefully, this will lead to an informative discussion.
Last edited: