I guess the merger is not quite a done deal.
Rahm's decision comes at a time when the PGA Tour and Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund are attempting to hammer out the final details of a framework agreement that would combine their commercial interests into a new for-profit entity, PGA Tour Enterprises.
Then there is this on poaching players from each other.
The June 6 framework agreement included a clause that prohibited both sides from attempting to poach each other's players, but it was removed after the U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division raised concerns that it restricted competition.
I came into this thread to address this question.
I couldn't fugre out how they could make a deal for Rahm in the middle of investment talks.
The US made it possible, lol.
This would reduce the value of the PGA Tour, just when the Saudi fund was determining valuation to invest. The Saudi's couldn't have asked for it to play out any better.
They can keep the same investment and now argue that PGA Tour is worth less without Rahm, and thus get a bigger stake in the company.
Unreal how that played out.
Makes no sense thet US Antitrust would allow individual player talks to happen during the negotiations.
I still feel like we're missing something.