Definitely the trend at bigger tracks unfortunately
like to know
@rdalert447 and
@str take on the original post
Smaller fields will show lower payoffs and higher favorite win % for sure. Less traffic, things around you and less things overall that might occur within the race help that statistic. But... that has been going on for several decades going back to the late 70's and 80's when every track wanted to run in the summer. That is what started all this. I could write a three page post on this but what is the sense. There is only one thing in my view, that can ever give racing the boost it needs to run uniform racing, throughout the country, for all different quality's of horse and provide fans with the best product they can , which is what is needed. The answer is, a commissioner that oversees it all, drives the bus if you will, and all the owners pulling together. A similar template that we see with the NFL, MLB, NBA, etc.
Without that, it is every man for themselves and these ultra rich families that own tracks will continue to own them for one thing and one thing only. PROFIT. And as soon as the land outruns the business model for value, that will be that, as the land will be sold for... Profit. Of course.
This is nothing new. We even saw one NFL owner try and work his money grab magic but ultimately failed because the other owners saw enough and forced that jerk out of the club.
That was Dan Snyder and the Washington "whateveryouwanttocallthems".
Maryland racing , who I am still in touch with in a very small way, as they try and restore what was once a storied history, with the new Pimlico. Plenty of damage has been done by the previous ownership but the State is now in charge. What makes this sustainable is it does NOT have to make a profit from day one. The sole purpose of it's existence is to revitalize racing for the state as well as it's fans, workers, etc.
But this is not the norm. This is a non profit state run entity. It is quite different. So as a whole, I feel like the only way to get racing back where it can be attractive to fans to the degree it was, is to work together, like the NFL, where two teams will play in the super bowl but all teams will gain by the popularity of the sport.
It sounds so easy and of course it is not easy at all. But probably the hardest part of all of this will be getting track owners to agree that their product is dying and the only value left is the ground it sits on.
Sorry for the long winded answer. I love the game and have since I was 15. I spent over three decades in it every single day and it really hurts to see it crumbling before my eyes. I walked away at age 46 because I knew as things stood, it was going to be much worse before it got better. The drugs made me puke. The greed did as well. And the game I fell in love with let me down.
What did Harry Chapin say ?: "Another man might have been angry, and another man might have been hurt. But another man never would have let her go. I stashed the bill in my shirt." Well, that's what happened in my case.
So much can be done, but a big hurtle is blocking the way for that. Owners personnel greed.
So Jay, it is really tricky. But it CAN happen. We can only hope we live to see it.
All the best.
str