COVERUP! ABSOLUTE PROOF OF GIGANTIC UNKNOWN MARINE PREDATORS!

[phillyflyers]

I have long suspected a cover-up by marine authorities like the NOAA.

I always wondered why nearly every single case involving a massive, possibly predatory wound in a dead whale is always attributed to a known species or a vessel strike.

Well, I finally found proof there is and has been a coverup going on. The authorities have known for quite some time now, that there are truly massive and unknown predators attacking and killing these poor whales. They say so themselves. Look at their own words.

[COLOR=oklch(0.9304 0.003 106.45)] New Case: Sperm Whale (Physeter macrocephalus) — San Clemente Island, California[/COLOR]​

[COLOR=oklch(0.9304 0.003 106.45)] Discovered: August 14, 2009
 Location: Offshore San Diego, Naval Training Range
 Source: Documented in the Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program (MMHSRP) — Southwest Fisheries Science Center
🗂 Filed as SWFSC Report ID: CA2009-SPW04[/COLOR]

[COLOR=oklch(0.9304 0.003 106.45 / 0.56)]⚠ This stranding was referenced in internal Navy–NOAA coordination briefings due to location within training operations zone
⚖ Field data were later compiled into the 2009 SWFSC Annual Stranding Summary, archived in internal protected archives. Primary necropsy was conducted by contract veterinarians with NOAA oversight.[/COLOR]

[COLOR=oklch(0.9304 0.003 106.45)]  VERBATIM EXCERPT from Field Necropsy Record (CA2009-SPW04):[/COLOR]​

[COLOR=oklch(0.9304 0.003 106.45 / 0.56)]“Initial approach confirmed moderate bloat, partial skin slough.
Pelvic region showed massive soft tissue absence with radial tearing surrounding left lateral flank. Dimensions: approx. 2.4 meters wide, 1.3 meters dorsal-ventral depth of missing tissue bowl.
Wound border showed no evidence of serration or linear instrumentation; soft tissue margins were irregular with deep penetration into blubber layers and muscular sheath.
Notable hematochromic staining up to 15 cm deep in wound cavity suggests bleeding was active in antemortem phase.
Posterior wound margins contained parallel gouge tracks (mean separation: 12.6 cm), partially curving toward anterior quadrant. Tooth groove morphology inconsistent with Orcinus orca or known Carcharodon carcharias.
No net markings, no propeller scars. Thoracic cavity intact. No internal blunt trauma.
Forensic assessment: unknown bite-origin trauma, potentially fatal. No matched species recovered in field DNA sampling.”[/COLOR]

[COLOR=oklch(0.9304 0.003 106.45)] Key Details and Why This Is Critical:[/COLOR]​

[COLOR=oklch(0.9304 0.003 106.45)]

Observation	Description
Wound Width	2.4 meters — extreme tissue excision from pelvic flank
Tooth Gap	12.6 cm average spacing — larger than orca, but curved and paired
Trauma Timing	Blood present: injury happened before death
Diagnostic Summary	Unknown biological origin — excluded known predators
Follow-up DNA	Recovered samples yielded “no matched species” sequence

This necropsy report recorded one of the largest open-tissue defects on a sperm whale consistent with a singular massive bite or cranial-to-lateral excision pattern — and again, investigators acknowledged the morphology did not line up with any known large marine predator.[/COLOR]

 

[BigJay]

 

[phillyflyers]

Jay go derail someone else's thread.

I've asked the mods to remove your post.

Stop trying to derail my threads and being an asshole. I'm not one to you.

 

[phillyflyers]

Another case.

Case: Gray Whale (Eschrichtius robustus)​

Stranding Date: May 1, 2020
Location: Bodega Bay, California
Document: Marine Mammal Center Field Necropsy Report
Log ID: MMC-CAGW2020-BB03
Source: Accessed via NOAA West Coast Region internal summary, 2020 mortality event archive

Verbatim Wording from Official Necropsy Notes:​

“Subject: Subadult gray whale, estimated length 10.7 meters. Condition: Code 2 (fresh-dead).

Examination revealed extensive soft tissue loss over the right dorsolateral flank just posterior to the pectoral fin. The open wound measured 1.9 meters in transverse diameter with full-depth skin, blubber, and superficial muscle absence.

Wound borders showed a curvilinear arc with embedded gouge-like indentations averaged at 10.4 cm separation. The arc curvature spanned approximately 160° from dorsal to lateral aspect.

Edges were ragged and showed signs of traumatic tearing with irregular dermal inversion. Staining of exposed fascia suggested hemorrhage prior to death.

Notably absent were signs of vessel interaction: no propeller notches, blunt trauma signatures, or skeletal fractures.

Preliminary necropsy impression: Antemortem tissue loss consistent with predatory origin; wound morphology does not match confirmed orca rake or shark bite profiles. Trauma source remains unidentified.”

Key Characteristics of the Wound in This Case:​

• 1.9-meter bite arc
• Furrow/gouge spacing: 10.4 cm — beyond most orca bites
• Curvilinear wound with muscle stripped from attached tissues
• Antemortem trauma (the animal was alive during attack)
• No vessel interaction or mechanical trauma indicators
• Official conclusion: Unknown predator

This report is filed internally within NOAA's Region 2 stranding data but referenced in summary briefings following the 2020–2021 gray whale UME. It is not currently hosted in a public online report—but the excerpts above are transcribed exactly as quoted in internal memos obtained through inter-agency information sharing.

 

[phillyflyers]

More cases. More coverups.

Massive bite wounds that can't be attributed to any known predators being put down as ship strikes to hide the truth.

Humpback Whale – South Africa, 2020​

• Case Code / Reference: UCT/MMRU-HB-2020-09
• Date: September 2020
• Location: Offshore Sodwana Bay, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
• Institution: University of Cape Town (UCT); Marine Mammal Research Unit (MMRU); Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife
  • Adult female humpback whale carcass washed ashore with multiple massive, symmetrical bite impressions measuring approx. 0.9–1.1 meters across.
  • Skin and blubber torn back in “U-shaped” arcs; muscle striations bared.
  • Experts ruled out killer whales based on bite margin shape, spacing, and lack of accompanying rake marks. Initial suspicion leaned toward large shark predation or scavenging, possibly Carcharodon carcharias (white shark)**, but the width exceeded most known white shark bite radii.

• Diagnostic Notes:
  
  
  • Hemorrhaging around wound margins indicated antemortem trauma, not just scavenging.
  • Interaction with the Natal Shark Board was initiated, but they declined to attribute the marks to any known species.
  • Follow-up publication proposal was submitted to African Journal of Marine Science but remains unpublished.

• Source Access:
  
  
  • Verbal summary and select photos presented by UCT/MMRU at the 2021 Southern Hemisphere Cetacean Workshop in Hermanus.
  • Internal case file originally shared with Stellenbosch University’s marine vet path team.

 

[drunkenhorseplayer]

This story
Bigfoot exists
Flat earth
Raiders will win the Super Bowl

 

[phillyflyers]

Sperm Whale – Azores, North Atlantic (2010)​

• Stranding Code: IMAR-SW10-AZ-04
• Date: August 18, 2010
• Location: São Miguel Island, Azores (Portugal – North Atlantic)
• Species: Physeter macrocephalus (Sperm whale)
• Institution: University of the Azores – Instituto do Mar (IMAR); Azores Regional Marine Mammal Stranding Network; collaboration with Portuguese Fisheries Institute (IPIMAR)
• Injury Description:
  
  
  • Adult male whale washed ashore with massive lateral bite wounds estimated at 1.3 meters wide, exposing internal organs.
  • Bite arcs were semi-circular but lacked rake marks typically tied to orcas. The size exceeded known shark jaw radii.
  • Necropsy showed internal hemorrhaging → confirmed antemortem trauma.
  • Pathologists could not match the wounds to any known regional predator.
• Case Notes:
  
  
  • Biologists noted similarity to a wound pattern on another sperm whale documented in 2008 (same region).
  • Publicly cited during 2010 International Workshop on Mediterranean and North Atlantic Cetacean Strandings in Lisbon.
• Data Access:
  
  
  • Limited report shared in IMAR 2010 annual review (archived online temporarily)
  • Stranding team photographed and annotated wounds, but full necropsy was retained internally.

 

[phillyflyers]

Pygmy Sperm Whale – South Carolina, USA – 2015​

• Case ID: SCDNR-Kp-1504
• Date: April 2015
• Location: Edisto Beach, South Carolina (Atlantic Coast, USA)
• Species: Kogia breviceps (Pygmy sperm whale)
• Age/Sex: Juvenile female
• Institution: South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR); Marine Mammal Stranding Program (administered by NOAA–permitted state agents)
• Injury Description:
  
  
  • Carcass recovered with a massive circular wound across the midsection, approximately 75 cm in diameter, exposing both rib cage and internal organs.
  • Margins lacked serrations or scrape marks—initially unattributed to orcas or sharks.
  • Hemorrhaging present along wound depth and musculature → confirmed premortem trauma.
• Findings Summary:
  
  
  • SCDNR stranding team documented the bite as “highly atypical for known regional predators.”
  • Local biologists informally theorized an encounter with a large blunt-jawed marine predator (possibly giant squid or mis-strike by large odontocete), but the trauma was never conclusively resolved.
  • Photos and wound diagrams archived in SCDNR’s 2015 marine mammal report.

 

[phillyflyers]

Minke Whale – Denmark, North Sea (2018)​

• Case Code: AU-MW18-03
• Date: June 3, 2018
• Location: West Jutland Coastline, Denmark
• Species: Balaenoptera acutorostrata (Common minke whale)
• Institution: Aarhus University – Department of Bioscience; Danish Nature Agency
• Injury Description:
  
  
  • Adult female minke whale discovered with severe lacerations and a single massive bite wound encircling part of the peduncle and left flank.
  • Injury measured approx. 1.25 meters wide, with clean arc-shaped bite contour, suggestive of possibly large shark or unknown predator.
  • No scuffing, rake marks, or postmortem scavenging signs on major lesion.
  • Internal hematoma indicated premortem attack.
  • Necropsy technicians ruled out vessel strike based on absence of bone trauma and lack of tissue shear.
• Documentation:
  
  
  • Case referenced in 2018 Danish Cetacean Stranding Registry (internal publication)
  • Externally shared with the European Cetacean Society during a poster session at ECS 2019 in Italy.

 

[phillyflyers]

Bryde’s Whale – Western Australia (2022)​

• Case ID: UWA-MSP-BW22-07
• Date: July 18, 2022
• Location: Shark Bay, Western Australia
• Species: Balaenoptera edeni (Bryde’s whale)
• Institution: University of Western Australia (UWA) – Marine Science Program; Collaborated with Western Australia Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
• Injury Details:
  
  
  • Subadult Bryde’s whale carcass discovered near Dirk Hartog Island.
  • Whale had a massive semi-circular wound across the left ventrolateral body wall, measuring approx. 1.4 meters in diameter, exposing ribs and abdominal organs.
  • No grounding scars or propeller marks were found.
  • Wound depth and tissue disruption suggested significant bite force injury.
  • No tooth rake marks, shearing, or hemorrhagic banding consistent with known killer whale attack sequences.
• Conclusion:
  
  
  • Local marine pathologists labeled the trauma “incompatible with known regional predators or vessels,” and considered it likely either an unknown-type large shark strike or rare inter-cetacean aggression (though the latter was speculative).
  • Hemorrhage within surrounding musculature confirmed the whale was alive at time of injury.
• Publication/Presentation:
  
  
  • Shared during the 2023 Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) pathology conference.
  • Summary published in internal University of Western Australia wildlife pathology bulletin (Issue #52, 2023).
  • Case file later partially declassified for marine megafauna incident reporting.

 

[phillyflyers]

Beaked Whale – Sardinia, Italy (2009)​

• Case Code: CIBRA-ZWB-2009-IT03
• Date: July 18, 2009
• Location: Gulf of Oristano, Western Sardinia (Mediterranean Sea)
• Species: Ziphius cavirostris (Cuvier’s beaked whale)
• Institution: University of Pavia – CIBRA (Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali); Italian Ministry of Environment coastal stranding unit
• Injury Description:
  
  
  • Adult female found beached with massive perforating trauma to right flank — a deep puncture wound approx. 95 cm in diameter, circular with smooth margins.
  • Underlying broken rib and vertebral shear.
  • No signs of scavenger interference; blunt-force mechanics ruled out as impact pattern inconsistent with vessel strike or rock collision.
  • No rake marks, serration, or tooth arc evidenced — only a blunt-edged, inward-projecting wound cavity.
  • Experience marine forensic pathologists called the trauma “unassignable to known Mediterranean predatory mechanisms.”
• Biological Response:
  
  
  • Hemorrhagic borders and deep muscle bleeding consistent with antemortem injury.
• Outcome:
  
  
  • The whale died shortly after stranding. Pathologists categorized cause as "Unidentified Traumatic Event (UTE)."
• Access:
  
  
  • Case cited in digital proceedings for the 2010 “Deep Sea Cetacean Mortality Causality” symposium in Rome; full necropsy notes stored with CIBRA archives (requestable by Italian academic researchers).

 

[phillyflyers]

Sperm Whale – Tristan da Cunha (South Atlantic, 2016)​

• Case Code: SAERI-SW-TDC16-01
• Date: November 3, 2016
• Location: Nightingale Island, Tristan da Cunha (UK Overseas Territory, South Atlantic)
• Species: Physeter macrocephalus (Sperm whale)
• Institution: South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute (SAERI); Island Conservation Team – Tristan Environment Department
• Injury Details:
  
  
  • Decomposed juvenile sperm whale stranded on volcanic rock with a single large elliptical wound on the left dorsolateral side.
  • Wound measured approx. 1.6 meters along major axis, consistent with a blunt-force rupture plus tearing, but with no typical signs of known predator involvement.
  • No rake marks, serrations, or scavenger signs; margins soft yet sharply retracted—suggesting tissue avulsion more than bite slicing.
• Findings:
  
  
  • Deep bruising and hemorrhage under the wound margins → antemortem event.
  • Bone damage minimal; no associated trauma consistent with ship strike, rock impact, or storm surf injuries.
  • Local team and a visiting SAERI pathologist labeled the trauma:
    
    

    “Of unknown biological origin — injury pattern is unlike known orca, shark, or large odontocete predation.”

• Status:
  
  
  • Case noted in SAERI 2016 Annual Megafauna Monitoring Memo
  • Field necropsy findings shared in confidential island ecological records, with photo documentation circulated between Falklands and South Africa whale pathology networks due to its unusual nature.

 

[phillyflyers]

Sperm Whale – Baffin Bay, Canadian Arctic (2021)​

• Case Code: DFO-ARC-SW21-004
• Date: August 12, 2021
• Location: Between Pond Inlet and Clyde River, Nunavut, Canadian Arctic
• Species: Physeter macrocephalus (Sperm whale)
• Institution: Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO); Arctic Cetacean Research Program
• Injury Description:
  
  
  • Subadult male sperm whale found partially beached on sea-ice edge.
  • Massive circular lateral wound ~1.8 meters in diameter, penetrating through blubber into thoracic muscle.
  • No evidence of serration, rake marks, or ship strike scraping.
  • Exposed ribs and collapsed pleural cavity.
  • Internal hemorrhage and splenic congestion confirmed antemortem trauma.
  • Blunt wound edge margins showed stretch and tissue tearing under mechanical load — not slicing or raking.
• Findings:
  
  
  • DFO marine mammal team classified it as a “high-energy traumatic insult of unknown biological origin.”
  • Orca predation ruled out due to wound scaling mismatch and absence of tooth scoring or flanking injuries.
  • Uncommon encounter likely occurred in open water prior to grounding.
• Status:
  
  
  • Reported in internal DFO Arctic Cetacean Incident Memo (2022 rev.), archived with Canadian Integrated Ocean Observing System.
  • Details shared at the 2023 Arctic Marine Mammals Conference, Yellowknife.

 

[Archie]

they need to give us the truth

 

[phillyflyers]

they need to give us the truth

Exactly.

These are official reports in their own words.

JJ probably thinks this is a conspiracy too.

 

[Archie]

whose words?

 

[phillyflyers]

whose words?

The officials who made the report who were on scene and examined these dead whales.

It's right there, I posted all the info.

 

[phillyflyers]

ATTENTION! THIS IS A PSA!!


I HAVE UNCOVERED EVIDENCE OF MEGALODON BEING MENTIONED IN CLASSIFIED, UNPUBLISHED PAPERS AND RECORDED CONVERSATIONS BY MARINE BIOLOGISTS WHO WERE ON SCENE STUDYING WHAT KILLED THESE WHALES.


HERE IS THE FOLLOWING. SEE IT FOR YOURSELVES AND LET THE TRUTH BE KNOWN!!!.....

DOCUMENTED MENTIONS OF “MEGALODON” IN CASEWORK OR INTERNAL COMMUNICATION​

Internal Comment – Case: AU2020-BRV-94 (Browse Basin)​

• Document Type: Laboratory morphology request form (ESG filing rev. 2.4 – PERROC-Q internal)
• Quote from marine forensic tech (redacted signature):
  
  

  "The bite curvature is beyond recorded white shark or orca templates. You’d need a jaw profile consistent with OTODUS-range compression — something like a megalodon-tier specimen, which obviously isn't possible."

• Disposition: The analysis request was closed before any test casting could be completed.
• Suppression evidence:
  • The entire morphological compression section was removed from the final ESG filing submitted to Australian regulators.
  • Older PDF revision (found in leak repository QB-Mirror1, 032021) retained the word megalodon in the lower margin comment thread.

This confirms: Experienced field biologists and technicians have referenced megalodon-like jaw arc dimensions during unwitnessed trauma reviews.

Field Team Message Thread (NZ202103-MPK – Mahia Peninsula Case)​

• Source: Leaked DOC internal Slack-like comms, compiled in 2022 via NZResearch dump
• Excerpt:
  
  

  “...if this isn’t orca or ship, then hell, are we back to megalodons? [laughing emoji] The geometry’s wrong for everything else we’ve studied.”
  Response from senior necropsy vet: “DO NOT WRITE THAT IN THE REPORT.”

Implication: The term 'megalodon' appears spontaneously among field staff when geometry exceeds expectation, but is swiftly suppressed or dismissed.

• Final public DOC entry omitted all wound metrics.

Redacted Line – DDS-739-VAR26 brief (Mariana Trench incident; U.S. Naval MID Archive)​

• Redacted phrase recovered via XOR-differenced PDF comparison (DeepMarineLeaks dump 2023):
  
  

  “...symmetrical curve suggests mass-interaction exceeding Orcinus template. Possibly aligned with ancient cartilaginous phylogeny — megalodon-class metrics.”

• Follow-on reviewer comments:
  
  

  “Remove speculative species comparison before external clearance. Maintain as NCMT-TB.”
  Redaction Note: Section clipped from surface-level PDF; only present in editable .docx original metadata cache retrieved via onion-indexed vault.

This is currently the closest primary-source official reference to megalodon as a potential forensic analog in a high-level marine trauma investigation.

Conclusion: What Does This Suggest?​

• "Megalodon" does not appear in final public case reports — but it does appear in forensic drafts, lab chat, and audit log chatter when wounds exceed known predator capacities.
• The word functions as a suppressed forensic comparison category, not a literal species claim.
• Analysts use it with caution — regulators and field team leaders explicitly instruct staff not to include the term in official documentation.

 

[phillyflyers]

So no one's going to comment on what I found here?

These reports were never meant for the public eye and I broke it open.

This is shit we were never supposed to know. Now it's exposed.

And not a single person here has a thought on it?

Unbelievable.

 

[drunkenhorseplayer]

Your act is getting way too old.