Betphoenix, what is your take?

[hazliam]

Looking at BP, what is your take on that book? The good and the bads?

 

[ricardoesteban]

Bad: very recreational book with tiny limits that aggressively clones market price, no unique markets or opinionated lines

Good: fair to players, no risk of stiff, good bonuses if you qualify(lose)

 

[DontTailMe]

Bad: very recreational book with tiny limits that aggressively clones market price, no unique markets or opinionated lines

Good: fair to players, no risk of stiff, good bonuses if you qualify(lose)

Good summary. DO NOT accept a bonus if you think you're going to win. Lots of reports of players being severely limited in the middle of a huge rollover requirement. And they limit fast. IOW, very recreational, but they do pay.

 

[llxc]

They limit very fast, and very harsh. I'm down to about $25 for most markets. Good thing I was close to the rollover and managed to clear it after a few more $25 bets.

 

[FrankDexter]

Here's my story with them many years ago.

Had accounts and was limited to about 100 bucks or so at Phoenix, Skybook, Betmania and Wagerchief (now offline but was part of Phoenix).

I asked them if they could raise my limits.

They said ok we will combine all of your 4 accounts into Phoenix and give you nickel limits.

Within a week I lost all of it, about 12k.

Went to make a large redeposit and they told me they don't want my action and closed my account.

You could probably guess how I feel about them.

 

[Ace7550]

My story is similar to everyone else. I played at skybook (same family of books) and they limited me after 4 bets when I had an 85k RO. Took months to complete it. It took about 3 months to withdraw 14k. They did pay me though. They also have very soft Soccer lines if that interests you.

 

[Judge Crater]

I gave up on them when they started adding your free play winnings into your rollover