Wagerallsports
Wagerallsports
Administrator
Staff member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2018
- Messages
- 56,992
AAC 2024 preview: Breaking down Memphis, Tulane, Army and other contenders
ESPN PLUS $ MATERIALThe American Athletic Conference may have forever rebelled against the idea of a Group of 5, but it also spent most of the past decade ruling that universe. It nabbed seven of the G5's last nine New Year's Six bowl bids, scored maybe the two most impressive G5 wins of the era -- Houston's 38-24 thumping of Florida State in the 2015 Peach Bowl and UCF's 34-27 win over Auburn in the 2017 Peach Bowl -- and, through Cincinnati in 2021, landed the G5's only College Football Playoff bid. (And as I will forever remind everyone, while the Bearcats might have gotten thumped by Alabama in the CFP, they fared better than Michigan did against Georgia on the same day.)
Houston, UCF and Cincinnati are no longer in the AAC, however, leaving for the Big 12 in 2023. Memphis and Tulane, who scored NY6 bids in 2019 and 2022, are still around, and they're among the favorites to win the conference in 2024. But as we head into a new era, with an expanded 12-team CFP, the AAC is just a member of the pack.
The AAC's average SP+ rating in 2023, the first year after it traded quality for quantity -- in the form of six Conference USA teams who went a combined 31-43 and averaged an SP+ ranking of 97.2 -- ranked just eighth among FBS' 10 conferences and third among the Group of 5. After losing defending champion SMU to the ACC, it starts out eighth in 2024, too. But it has Memphis, maybe this year's most high-upside G5 team. In Tulane and UTSA (easily the shining light of the CUSA imports), it has two teams that aren't too far from the top of the G5 mountain. In USF, it has an intriguing turnaround story. It has Army now, too! The AAC of the 12-team CFP era isn't the AAC of the four-team era, but it's still got loads of storylines to follow.
Let's preview the AAC!
2023 recap
SMU won the AAC in its last year in the conference, but here's how this year's members performed last year.TEAM | REC. (CONF) | SP+ RK | OFF. SP+ | DEF. SP+ | ST SP+ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTSA (AAC) | 9-4 (7-1) | 5.4 (48) | 31.3 (36) | 27.3 (74) | 1.4 (24) |
Memphis (AAC) | 10-3 (6-2) | 3.5 (55) | 37.1 (10) | 33.8 (111) | 0.3 (62) |
Tulane (AAC) | 11-3 (8-1) | 2.8 (59) | 26.5 (66) | 24.4 (47) | 0.8 (48) |
Army (Indies) | 6-6 | -4.0 (79) | 18.4 (114) | 22.5 (37) | 0.1 (69) |
USF (AAC) | 7-6 (4-4) | -6.6 (85) | 28.4 (55) | 34.5 (117) | -0.4 (81) |
N. Texas (AAC) | 5-7 (3-5) | -6.7 (86) | 32.9 (27) | 41.3 (133) | 1.7 (13) |
FAU (AAC) | 4-8 (3-5) | -9.4 (100) | 19.8 (104) | 27.9 (80) | -1.2 (103) |
Rice (AAC) | 6-7 (4-4) | -10.2 (103) | 26.0 (69) | 34.4 (114) | -1.8 (118) |
ECU (AAC) | 2-10 (1-7) | -12.8 (111) | 15.4 (124) | 28.1 (81) | -0.1 (75) |
Navy (AAC) | 5-7 (4-4) | -13.7 (113) | 15.0 (126) | 27.2 (71) | -1.5 (107) |
Tulsa (AAC) | 4-8 (2-6) | -13.7 (114) | 20.9 (99) | 34.7 (118) | 0.1 (67) |
UAB (AAC) | 4-8 (3-5) | -14.7 (117) | 26.9 (64) | 39.6 (132) | -2.1 (133) |
Temple (AAC) | 3-9 (1-7) | -21.0 (127) | 18.6 (110) | 37.8 (130) | -1.9 (122) |
Charlotte (AAC) | 3-9 (2-6) | -21.4 (129) | 14.8 (127) | 34.4 (115) | -1.8 (117) |
After a couple of solid seasons, East Carolina collapsed to 2-10 under the weight of lost production and close losses (the Pirates were Bizarro Tulane, going 0-4 in one-score finishes), while USF pulled the opposite, charging from 1-11 to 7-6 under Alex Golesh thanks to a spicy offense. Among AAC newbies, North Texas, Florida Atlantic and Rice were decent, while UAB was one-dimensional (offense good, defense horrendous) and Charlotte started on the ground floor with new coach Biff Poggi. Tulsa showed early promise under first-year coach Kevin Wilson before collapsing, and Temple ... never really showed promise under second-year Stan Drayton.
Army still held superiority over Navy despite unsuccessful changes to its offense; both teams improved late in the season, but Army's 17-11 win over Brian Newberry's first Midshipmen team allowed them to finish the year on a four-game winning streak. Then the Black Knights became a football-only AAC member. (Though they'll still play Navy as a nonconference rival because not everything is allowed to make sense.)
2024 projections
TEAM | SP+ (RK) | OFF. | DEF. | AVG. W | CONF. W | SOS RK |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memphis | 7.2 (39) | 40.5 (9) | 33.4 (102) | 9.0 | 6.3 | 92 |
UTSA | 1.7 (53) | 30.6 (52) | 28.9 (70) | 8.4 | 5.9 | 83 |
Tulane | -1.3 (65) | 25.7 (72) | 27.0 (55) | 7.0 | 5.4 | 85 |
USF | -4.1 (76) | 31.1 (47) | 35.2 (118) | 6.7 | 4.8 | 69 |
ECU | -10.6 (99) | 17.9 (116) | 28.4 (67) | 6.2 | 4.3 | 124 |
Army | -9.3 (95) | 18.7 (112) | 28.0 (63) | 6.4 | 4.3 | 102 |
Rice | -6.4 (89) | 26.5 (69) | 32.9 (98) | 6.7 | 3.9 | 117 |
FAU | -14.2 (115) | 15.5 (124) | 29.7 (78) | 6.0 | 3.5 | 134 |
Navy | -11.6 (108) | 16.0 (122) | 27.6 (61) | 5.2 | 3.5 | 93 |
N. Texas | -11.7 (109) | 30.6 (53) | 42.3 (133) | 5.1 | 3.4 | 106 |
UAB | -11.4 (105) | 31.6 (40) | 43.0 (134) | 5.8 | 3.4 | 115 |
Tulsa | -14.3 (116) | 23.2 (85) | 37.5 (126) | 5.1 | 3.3 | 118 |
Charlotte | -19.0 (127) | 16.7 (121) | 35.7 (120) | 3.2 | 2.0 | 112 |
Temple | -21.8 (132) | 18.0 (115) | 39.8 (131) | 2.9 | 2.0 | 97 |
AAC Title Odds
TEAM | CONF. TITLE % | 11+ WINS % | 6+ WINS % | RET PROD (RK) | OFF RET | DEF RET |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memphis | 33.9% | 11.8% | 99.4% | 70.3% (22) | 72.3% (31) | 68.3% (35) |
UTSA | 20.6% | 4.2% | 98.2% | 59.1% (84) | 56.3% (86) | 62.0% (57) |
Tulane | 13.2% | 0.5% | 85.3% | 54.0% (96) | 54.0% (90) | 54.0% (97) |
USF | 8.1% | 0.1% | 80.1% | 79.5% (8) | 87.3% (5) | 71.6% (24) |
ECU | 3.7% | 0.2% | 67.1% | 59.6% (79) | 61.3% (69) | 58.0% (76) |
Army | 5.5% | 0.2% | 47.5% | 47.0% (110) | 58.5% (76) | 35.6% (128) |
Rice | 4.8% | 0.5% | 76.8% | 81.1% (5) | 72.8% (28) | 89.3% (1) |
FAU | 1.7% | 0.2% | 62.8% | 43.5% (121) | 35.9% (122) | 51.0% (105) |
Navy | 2.6% | 0.0% | 40.8% | 65.3% (50) | 62.6% (62) | 68.0% (37) |
N. Texas | 1.9% | 0.0% | 38.3% | 49.9% (104) | 43.4% (115) | 56.4% (87) |
UAB | 2.0% | 0.1% | 58.5% | 64.5% (58) | 84.8% (7) | 44.2% (117) |
Tulsa | 1.4% | 0.0% | 39.5% | 46.5% (112) | 56.3% (85) | 36.7% (127) |
Charlotte | 0.3% | 0.0% | 5.9% | 54.5% (95) | 58.1% (77) | 50.8% (106) |
Temple | 0.2% | 0.0% | 3.7% | 36.7% (130) | 40.2% (119) | 33.2% (130) |
Five best games of 2024
Here are the five conference games that feature (a) the highest combined SP+ ratings for both teams and (b) a projected scoring margin under 10 points.
USF at Tulane (Sept. 28). After going a combined 8-37 from 2019-22, USF indeed charged to seven wins in Year 1 with Golesh. And we'll know just how dangerous the Bulls are by the end of a September run that sees them travel to Alabama and host Miami before heading to New Orleans for this one.
Memphis at USF (Oct. 11). The first of three huge in-conference road trips and the one Memphis can probably least afford to lose. Memphis won this matchup 59-50 in 2023, and the odds of a similarly ridiculous track meet in 2024 are solid.
UTSA at Rice (Oct. 12). After a tricky nonconference slate featuring two in-state road trips (at Texas State in Week 2, at Texas in Week 3), UTSA starts AAC play with trips to ECU and Rice. The closing stretch is loaded with home games, but that's a hell of a gauntlet over the first half of the season.
Memphis at UTSA (Nov. 2). Now to the brass tacks. Both Memphis and UTSA are projected favorites in each of the five games leading up to this one. Will both be entertaining CFP hopes entering November, or will one of them have tripped up before then?
Memphis at Tulane (Nov. 28). Quite possibly an AAC championship elimination game over Thanksgiving weekend. That, or the first of back-to-back Memphis-Tulane games.